In silico study of substrate chemistry effect on the tethering of engineered antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 detection: Amorphous silica vs gold

dc.contributor.authorMarti, Didac
dc.contributor.authorMartín Martínez, Eduard
dc.contributor.authorTorras Costa, Joan
dc.contributor.authorBertran Cànovas, Òscar
dc.contributor.authorTuron, Pau
dc.contributor.authorAleman, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-17T10:08:17Z
dc.date.available2022-06-17T10:08:17Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-01
dc.date.updated2022-06-17T09:47:20Z
dc.description.abstractThe influence of the properties of different solid substrates on the tethering of two antibodies, IgG1-CR3022 and IgG1-S309, which were specifically engineered for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, has been examined at the molecular level using conventional and accelerated Molecular Dynamics (cMD and aMD, respectively). Two surfaces with very different properties and widely used in immunosensors for diagnosis, amorphous silica and the most stable facet of the face-centered cubic gold structure, have been considered. The effects of such surfaces on the structure and orientation of the immobilized antibodies have been determined by quantifying the tilt and hinge angles that describe the orientation and shape of the antibody, respectively, and the dihedrals that measure the relative position of the antibody arms with respect to the surface. Results show that the interactions with amorphous silica, which are mainly electrostatic due to the charged nature of the surface, help to preserve the orientation and structure of the antibodies, especially of the IgG1-CR3022, indicating that the primary sequence of those antibodies also plays some role. Instead, short-range van der Waals interactions with the inert gold surface cause a higher degree tilting and fraying of the antibodies with respect to amorphous silica. The interactions between the antibodies and the surface also affect the correlation among the different angles and dihedrals, which increases with their strength. Overall, results explain why amorphous silica substrates are frequently used to immobilize antibodies in immunosensors. © 2022 The Authors
dc.format.extent12 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idimarina6545106
dc.identifier.issn0927-7765
dc.identifier.pmid35158221
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/186765
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112400
dc.relation.ispartofColloids And Surfaces B-Biointerfaces, 2022, vol. 213
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112400
dc.rightscc by-nc-nd (c) Marti, Didac et al, 2022
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut de Bioenginyeria de Catalunya (IBEC))
dc.subject.classificationSARS-CoV-2
dc.subject.classificationDiagnòstic
dc.subject.otherSARS-CoV-2
dc.subject.otherDiagnosis
dc.titleIn silico study of substrate chemistry effect on the tethering of engineered antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 detection: Amorphous silica vs gold
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
2022_ColSurBBio_InSilico_AlemanC.pdf
Mida:
8.57 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format