PREDICT validity for prognosis of breast cancer patients with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants

dc.contributor.authorMuranen, Taru A.
dc.contributor.authorMorra, Anna
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Sofia
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Daniel R.
dc.contributor.authorBolla, Manjeet K.
dc.contributor.authorDennis, Joe
dc.contributor.authorKeeman, Renske
dc.contributor.authorLeslie, Goska
dc.contributor.authorParsons, Michael T.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Qin
dc.contributor.authorAhearn, Thomas U.
dc.contributor.authorAittomäki, Kristiina
dc.contributor.authorAndrulis, Irene L.
dc.contributor.authorArun, Banu K.
dc.contributor.authorBehrens, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorBialkowska, Katarzyna
dc.contributor.authorBojesen, Stig E.
dc.contributor.authorCamp, Nicola J.
dc.contributor.authorChang Claude, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorCzene, Kamila
dc.contributor.authorDevilee, Peter
dc.contributor.authorDomchek, Susan M.
dc.contributor.authorDunning, Alison M.
dc.contributor.authorEngel, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorEvans, D. Gareth
dc.contributor.authorGago Dominguez, Manuela
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Closas, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorGerdes, Anne Marie
dc.contributor.authorGlendon, Gord
dc.contributor.authorGuénel, Pascal
dc.contributor.authorHahnen, Eric
dc.contributor.authorHamann, Ute
dc.contributor.authorHanson, Helen
dc.contributor.authorHooning, Maartje J.
dc.contributor.authorHoppe, Reiner
dc.contributor.authorIzatt, Louise
dc.contributor.authorJakubowska, Anna
dc.contributor.authorJames, Paul A.
dc.contributor.authorKristensen, Vessela N.
dc.contributor.authorLalloo, Fiona
dc.contributor.authorLindeman, Geoffrey J.
dc.contributor.authorMannermaa, Arto
dc.contributor.authorMargolin, Sara
dc.contributor.authorNeuhausen, Susan L.
dc.contributor.authorNewman, William G.
dc.contributor.authorPeterlongo, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Kelly Anne
dc.contributor.authorPujana Genestar, M. Ángel
dc.contributor.authorRantala, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorRønlund, Karina
dc.contributor.authorSaloustros, Emmanouil
dc.contributor.authorSchmutzler, Rita K.
dc.contributor.authorSchneeweiss, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorSinger, Christian F.
dc.contributor.authorSuvanto, Maija
dc.contributor.authorYen Tan, Yen
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, Manuel R.
dc.contributor.authorThomassen, Mads
dc.contributor.authorTischkowitz, Marc
dc.contributor.authorTripathi, Vishakha
dc.contributor.authorWappenschmidt, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Emily
dc.contributor.authorEaston, Douglas F.
dc.contributor.authorAntoniou, Antonis C.
dc.contributor.authorChenevix Trench, Georgia
dc.contributor.author Pharoah, Paul D. P.
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Marjanka K.
dc.contributor.authorBlomqvist, Carl
dc.contributor.authorNevanlinna, Heli
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-13T11:42:31Z
dc.date.available2025-11-13T11:42:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-12
dc.date.updated2025-11-12T15:55:46Z
dc.description.abstractWe assessed the PREDICT v 2.2 for prognosis of breast cancer patients with pathogenic germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, using follow-up data from 5453 BRCA1/2 carriers from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) and the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). PREDICT for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer had modest discrimination for BRCA1 carrier patients overall (Gonen & Heller unbiased concordance 0.65 in CIMBA, 0.64 in BCAC), but it distinguished clearly the high-mortality group from lower risk categories. In an analysis of low to high risk categories by PREDICT score percentiles, the observed mortality was consistently lower than the expected mortality, but the confidence intervals always included the calibration slope. Altogether, our results encourage the use of the PREDICT ER-negative model in management of breast cancer patients with germline BRCA1 variants. For the PREDICT ER-positive model, the discrimination was slightly lower in BRCA2 variant carriers (concordance 0.60 in CIMBA, 0.65 in BCAC). Especially, inclusion of the tumor grade distorted the prognostic estimates. The breast cancer mortality of BRCA2 carriers was underestimated at the low end of the PREDICT score distribution, whereas at the high end, the mortality was overestimated. These data suggest that BRCA2 status should also be taken into consideration with tumor characteristics, when estimating the prognosis of ER-positive breast cancer patients.
dc.format.extent15 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.issn2374-4677
dc.identifier.pmid37173335
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/224348
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-023-00546-x
dc.relation.ispartofnpj Breast Cancer, 2023, vol. 9, núm. 37
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-023-00546-x
dc.rightscc by (c) Muranen, Taru A. et al., 2023
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
dc.subject.classificationCàncer de mama
dc.subject.classificationPronòstic mèdic
dc.subject.otherBreast cancer
dc.subject.otherPrognosis
dc.titlePREDICT validity for prognosis of breast cancer patients with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publisherVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
s41523-023-00546-x.pdf
Mida:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format