Amb motiu del tancament d'estiu, la validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 28 d'agost de 2026. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Con motivo del cierre de verano, la validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 28 de agosto de 2026. Disculpad las molestias
Due to the summer closure, document validation will resume starting August 28, 2026. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Document type

Article

Version

Accepted version

Publication date

All rights reserved

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/165104

Choices that matter: Coalition formation and parties' ideological reputations

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

This paper examines how a party's decision to enter a coalition government affects voter perceptions of the party's policy position. We argue that, for the decision to change voter beliefs, it must be at odds with voters' prior opinions about the party. Specifically, the party must join a coalition that is not the one voters perceive as the ideologically closest option. Otherwise, the party's action simply confirms voters' pre-existing beliefs. Hence, whether or not joining a coalition alters voter attitudes depends on the type of alternative coalitions the party could enter. We test the hypothesis using three complementary empirical strategies: a cross-country analysis of party reputations in five coalition-prone European countries, individual panel data, and a quasi-experimental test. All three empirical tests provide support for our claim. This paper contributes to our understanding of voter information processing, coalition politics, and party competition.

Citation

Citation

FALCÓ GIMENO, Albert and FERNANDEZ-VAZQUEZ, Pablo. Choices that matter: Coalition formation and parties' ideological reputations. Political Science Research and Methods. 2019. ISSN 2049-8470. [consulted: 9 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/165104

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record