Amb motiu del tancament d'estiu, la validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 28 d'agost de 2026. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Con motivo del cierre de verano, la validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 28 de agosto de 2026. Disculpad las molestias
Due to the summer closure, document validation will resume starting August 28, 2026. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Document type

Article

Version

Published version

Publication date

Publication license

cc-by-nc-nd (c) Pérez Marín, Ana María, 2008
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/111232

Empirical comparison between the Nelson-Aalen and the Naive Local Constant estimator

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Related resource

Abstract

The Nelson-Aalen estimator is widely used in biostatistics as a non-parametric estimator of the cumulative hazard function based on a right censored sample. A number of alternative estimators can be mentioned, namely, the naive local constant estimator (Guill ´en, Nielsen and P´erez-Mar´ın, 2007) which provides improved bias versus variance properties compared to the traditional Nelson-Aalen estimator. Nevertheless, an empirical comparison of these two estimators has never been carried out. In this paper the efficiency performance of these two estimators when applied to real survival data are compared. Our results suggest that the efficiency improvement introduced by the naive local constant estimator is highly remarkable for all distribution quantiles, especially for low quantiles.

Citation

Citation

PÉREZ MARÍN, Ana María. Empirical comparison between the Nelson-Aalen and the Naive Local Constant estimator. Sort (Statistics and Operations Research Transactions). 2008. Vol. 32, num. 1, pags. 67-76. ISSN 1696-2281. [consulted: 9 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/111232

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record