Utilisation of radiotherapy in lung cancer: A scoping narrative literature review with a focus on the introduction of evidence-based therapeutic approaches in Europe

dc.contributor.authorBorràs Andrés, Josep Maria
dc.contributor.authorCorral, Julieta
dc.contributor.authorLievens, Yolande
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-03T17:58:49Z
dc.date.available2024-06-03T17:58:49Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-23
dc.date.updated2024-06-03T17:58:54Z
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose: The aim of this study was to review the published studies on the utilisation of radiotherapy in lung cancer (both small and non-small cell lung cancer, SCLC and NSCLC) patients in European countries with a population-based perspective. Material and methods: A literature search since January 2000 until December 2022 was carried out. Only English-published papers were included, and only European data was considered. PRISMA guidelines were followed. A scoping narrative review was undertaken due to the hetereogeneity of the published papers. Results: 38 papers were included in the analysis, with the majority from the Netherlands (52.6%) and the UK (18.4%). Large variability is observed in the reported radiotherapy utilisation, around 40% for NSCLC in general and between 26 and 42% in stage I NSCLC. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) shows a wide range of utilisation across countries and over time, from 8 to 63%. Similary, in stage III lung cancer, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) utilisation varied considerably (11-70%). Eleven studies compared radiotherapy utilisation between older and younger age-groups, showing that younger patients receive more CRT, while the opposite applies for SBRT. An widespreadlack of data on relevant covariates such as comorbidty and health-services related variables is observed. Conclusion: The actual utilisation of radiotherapy for lung cancer reported in patterns-of-care studies (POCs) is notably lower than the evidence-based optimal utilisation. Important variability is observed by country, time period, stage at diagnosis and age. A wider use of POCs should be promoted to improve our knowledge on the actual application of evidence-based treatment recommendations.
dc.format.extent12 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec743770
dc.identifier.issn2405-6308
dc.identifier.pmid38226026
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/212381
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100717
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and Translational Radiation Oncology, 2023, vol. 45
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100717
dc.rightscc-by (c) Corral, Julieta et al., 2023
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
dc.subject.classificationCàncer de pulmó
dc.subject.classificationRadioteràpia
dc.subject.classificationOncologia
dc.subject.otherLung cancer
dc.subject.otherRadiotherapy
dc.subject.otherOncology
dc.titleUtilisation of radiotherapy in lung cancer: A scoping narrative literature review with a focus on the introduction of evidence-based therapeutic approaches in Europe
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
845690.pdf
Mida:
6.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format