Predicting bilingual aphasia treatment outcomes using digital twins: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
| dc.contributor.author | Kiran, Swathi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Carpenter, Erin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Grasemann, Uli | |
| dc.contributor.author | Scimeca, Michael | |
| dc.contributor.author | Marte, Manuel José | |
| dc.contributor.author | Russell-Meill, Marissa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Peñaloza, Claudia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tripodis, Yorghos | |
| dc.contributor.author | Miikkulainen, Risto | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-05T13:24:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-05T13:24:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-04-10 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2026-10-05T13:24:36Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Bilingual aphasia rehabilitation faces the challenge of determining which language to target in therapy to maximize recovery across both languages. This double-blind randomized controlled trial (48 Spanish–English bilinguals with chronic aphasia; NCT02916524) evaluated whether the BiLex computational model could predict the optimal language for aphasia therapy. Participants received 40hofsemanticfeature-basedtreatmentineitherthe BiLex-recommendedlanguageortheopposite language. Both groups showed similar gains in treated-language naming, with no significant difference in proportion of maximal improvement (Difference (SE) =–0.03 (0.07); t =–0.46; p =0.65). However, the model-opposite group showed significantly greater cross-language generalization (Difference (SE) =–0.16 (0.07); t =–2.38; p= 0.02), though with higher response variability. Further, when the participants were divided into subgroups according to performance, the model-assigned group had a significant advantage in all but the lowest performing subgroups. All these differences were consistent with BiLex model predictions. | |
| dc.format.extent | 10 p. | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.idgrec | 772444 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2398-6352 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 41963587 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/231883 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Springer Nature | |
| dc.relation.isformatof | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02583-9 | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | npj Digital Medicine, 2026, vol. 9, 454 | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-026-02583-9 | |
| dc.rights | cc by-nc-nd (c) Kiran, S. et al., 2026 | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject.classification | Afàsia | |
| dc.subject.classification | Bilingüisme | |
| dc.subject.classification | Metodologia de la ciència | |
| dc.subject.other | Aphasia | |
| dc.subject.other | Bilingualism | |
| dc.subject.other | Science methodology | |
| dc.title | Predicting bilingual aphasia treatment outcomes using digital twins: a double-blind randomized controlled trial | eng |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
Fitxers
Paquet original
1 - 1 de 1