Management of bone health in solid tumours: From bisphosphonates to a monoclonal antibody

dc.contributor.authorvon Moos, Roger
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Luis
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Suárez, Eva
dc.contributor.authorTerpos, Evangelos
dc.contributor.authorNiepel, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorBody, Jean-Jacques
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-26T09:56:41Z
dc.date.available2020-10-26T09:56:41Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-01
dc.date.updated2020-10-26T09:19:49Z
dc.description.abstractPatients with solid tumours are at risk of impaired bone health from metastases and cancer therapy-induced bone loss (CTIBL). We review medical management of bone health in patients with solid tumours over the past 30 years, from first-generation bisphosphonates to the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL)-targeted monoclonal antibody, denosumab. In the 1980s, first-generation bisphosphonates were shown to reduce the incidence of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with breast cancer. Subsequently, more potent second-and third-generation bisphosphonates were developed, particularly zoledronic add (ZA). Head-to-head studies showed that ZA was significantly more effective than pamidronate for reducing SREs in patients with breast and castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), becoming the standard of care for more than a decade. The RANKL inhibitor denosumab was licensed in 2010, and head-to-head studies and integrated analyses confirmed its superiority to ZA for preventing SREs, particularly in breast cancer and CRPC. Bisphosphonates and denosumab have also been investigated for prevention of CTIBL in patients receiving hormonal therapy for breast and prostate cancer, and denosumab is licensed in this indication. Despite advances in management of bone health, several issues remain, notably the optimal time to initiate therapy, duration of therapy, and dosing frequency, and how to avoid toxicity, particularly with long-term treatment. In summary, introduction of ZA and denosumab has protected patients with bone metastasis from serious bone complications and improved their quality of life. Ongoing research will hopefully guide the optimal use of these agents to help maintain bone health in patients with solid tumours.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.pmid31136850
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/171550
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier Science Ltd.
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.05.003
dc.relation.ispartofCancer Treatment Reviews, 2019, vol. 76, p. 57-67
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/682935/EU//PLEIO-RANK
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.05.003
dc.rightscc by-nc-nd (c) von Moos et al., 2019
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
dc.subject.classificationCàncer d'ossos
dc.subject.classificationMetàstasi
dc.subject.otherBones cancer
dc.subject.otherMetastasis
dc.titleManagement of bone health in solid tumours: From bisphosphonates to a monoclonal antibody
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
vonMoosR.pdf
Mida:
866.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format