Fracture resistance after implantoplasty in three implant-abutment connection designs

dc.contributor.authorCamps Font, Octavi
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Barnadas, Albert
dc.contributor.authorMir Mari, Javier
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa de Figueiredo, Rui Pedro
dc.contributor.authorGay Escoda, Cosme
dc.contributor.authorValmaseda Castellón, Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-28T13:18:48Z
dc.date.available2021-01-28T13:18:48Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-01
dc.date.updated2021-01-25T08:06:28Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: To assess the effect of implantoplasty and implant-abutment design on the fracture resistance and macroscopic morphology of narrow-diameter (3.5 mm) dental implants. Material and Methods: Screw-shaped titanium dental implants (n = 48) were studied in vitro. Three groups (n = 16) were established, based on implant-abutment connection type: external hexagon, internal hexagon and conical. Eight implants from each group were subjected to an implantoplasty procedure; the remaining 8 implants served as controls. Implant wall thickness was recorded. All samples were subjected to a static strength test. Results: The mean wall thickness reductions varied between 106.46 and 153.75 gm. The mean fracture strengths for the control and test groups were, respectively, 1211.90 +/- 89.95 N and 873.11 +/- 92.37 N in the external hexagon implants; 918.41 +/- 97.19 N and 661.29 +/- 58.03 N in the internal hexagon implants; and 1058.67 +/- 114.05 N and 747.32 +/- 90.05 N in the conical connection implants. Implant wall thickness and fracture resistance (P < 0.001) showed a positive correlation. Fracture strength was influenced by both implantoplasty (P < 0.001) and connection type (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Implantoplasty in diameter-reduced implants decreases implant wall thickness and fracture resistance, and varies depending on the implant-abutment connection. Internal hexagon and conical connection implants seem to be more prone to fracture after implantoplasty.
dc.format.extent9 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.pmid32683385
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/173493
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMedicina Oral SL
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23700
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 2020, vol. 25, num. 5, p. e691-e699
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23700
dc.rights(c) Medicina Oral SL, 2020
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
dc.subject.classificationImplants dentals intraossis
dc.subject.classificationCirurgia dental
dc.subject.otherEndosseous dental implants
dc.subject.otherDental surgery
dc.titleFracture resistance after implantoplasty in three implant-abutment connection designs
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
Camps-FontO.pdf
Mida:
2.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format