Fracture resistance after implantoplasty in three implant-abutment connection designs
| dc.contributor.author | Camps Font, Octavi | |
| dc.contributor.author | González-Barnadas, Albert | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mir Mari, Javier | |
| dc.contributor.author | Barbosa de Figueiredo, Rui Pedro | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gay Escoda, Cosme | |
| dc.contributor.author | Valmaseda Castellón, Eduardo | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-28T13:18:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-01-28T13:18:48Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-09-01 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2021-01-25T08:06:28Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: To assess the effect of implantoplasty and implant-abutment design on the fracture resistance and macroscopic morphology of narrow-diameter (3.5 mm) dental implants. Material and Methods: Screw-shaped titanium dental implants (n = 48) were studied in vitro. Three groups (n = 16) were established, based on implant-abutment connection type: external hexagon, internal hexagon and conical. Eight implants from each group were subjected to an implantoplasty procedure; the remaining 8 implants served as controls. Implant wall thickness was recorded. All samples were subjected to a static strength test. Results: The mean wall thickness reductions varied between 106.46 and 153.75 gm. The mean fracture strengths for the control and test groups were, respectively, 1211.90 +/- 89.95 N and 873.11 +/- 92.37 N in the external hexagon implants; 918.41 +/- 97.19 N and 661.29 +/- 58.03 N in the internal hexagon implants; and 1058.67 +/- 114.05 N and 747.32 +/- 90.05 N in the conical connection implants. Implant wall thickness and fracture resistance (P < 0.001) showed a positive correlation. Fracture strength was influenced by both implantoplasty (P < 0.001) and connection type (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Implantoplasty in diameter-reduced implants decreases implant wall thickness and fracture resistance, and varies depending on the implant-abutment connection. Internal hexagon and conical connection implants seem to be more prone to fracture after implantoplasty. | |
| dc.format.extent | 9 p. | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 32683385 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/173493 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Medicina Oral SL | |
| dc.relation.isformatof | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23700 | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 2020, vol. 25, num. 5, p. e691-e699 | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23700 | |
| dc.rights | (c) Medicina Oral SL, 2020 | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.source | Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL)) | |
| dc.subject.classification | Implants dentals intraossis | |
| dc.subject.classification | Cirurgia dental | |
| dc.subject.other | Endosseous dental implants | |
| dc.subject.other | Dental surgery | |
| dc.title | Fracture resistance after implantoplasty in three implant-abutment connection designs | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
Fitxers
Paquet original
1 - 1 de 1