Multifocal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia Does Not Provide a Clinical Benefit Over Speech Therapy

dc.contributor.authorBorrego Écija, Sergi
dc.contributor.authorMontagut Colomer, Núria
dc.contributor.authorMartín Trias, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorVaqué Alcázar, Lídia
dc.contributor.authorIllán Gala, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorBalasa, Mircea
dc.contributor.authorLladó Plarrumaní, Albert
dc.contributor.authorCasanova Molla, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorBargalló Alabart, Núria​
dc.contributor.authorValls Solé, Josep
dc.contributor.authorLleó, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorBartrés Faz, David
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Valle, Raquel
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T13:11:38Z
dc.date.available2024-01-24T13:11:38Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-30
dc.date.updated2024-01-22T11:39:19Z
dc.description.abstractPrimary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a group of neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia characterized by language deterioration. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive intervention for brain dysfunction.To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of tDCS combined with speech therapy in the three variants of PPA. We evaluate changes in fMRI activity in a subset of patients.Double-blinded, randomized, cross-over, and sham-controlled tDCS study. 15 patients with PPA were included. Each patient underwent two interventions: a) speech therapy + active tDCS and b) speech therapy + sham tDCS stimulation. A multifocal strategy with anodes placed in the left frontal and parietal regions was used to stimulate the entire language network. Efficacy was evaluated by comparing the results of two independent sets of neuropsychological assessments administered at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1 month and 3 months after the intervention. In a subsample, fMRI scanning was performed before and after each intervention.The interventions were well tolerated. Participants in both arms showed clinical improvement, but no differences were found between active and sham tDCS interventions in any of the evaluations. There were trends toward better outcomes in the active tDCS group for semantic association and reading skills. fMRI identified an activity increase in the right frontal medial cortex and the bilateral paracingulate gyrus after the active tDCS intervention.We did not find differences between active and sham tDCS stimulation in clinical scores of language function in PPA patients.
dc.format.extent32 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idimarina9354700
dc.identifier.issn1875-8908
dc.identifier.pmid37182884
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/206269
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIOS PRESS
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-230069
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Alzheimers Disease, 2023, vol. 93, num. 3, p. 1169-1180
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-230069
dc.rights(c) Borrego Écija, Sergi et al, 2023
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
dc.subject.classificationAfàsia
dc.subject.classificationLogopèdia
dc.subject.otherAphasia
dc.subject.otherSpeech therapy
dc.titleMultifocal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia Does Not Provide a Clinical Benefit Over Speech Therapy
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
manuscript_tDCS_JAD_20230327.pdf
Mida:
746.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format