Abacavir/Lamivudine Versus Tenofovir/Emtricitabine in Virologically Suppressed Patients Switching from Ritonavir-Boosted Protease Inhibitors to Raltegravir

dc.contributor.authorMartínez Chamorro, Esteban José
dc.contributor.authorD'Albuquerque, Polyana M.
dc.contributor.authorPérez Catalán, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorPich, Judit
dc.contributor.authorGatell, José M.
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-28T11:39:41Z
dc.date.available2014-07-28T11:39:41Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-24
dc.date.updated2014-07-28T11:39:42Z
dc.description.abstractThere are few clinical data on the combination abacavir/lamivudine plus raltegravir. We compared the outcomes of patients from the SPIRAL trial receiving either abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine at baseline who had taken at least one dose of either raltegravir or ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors. For the purpose of this analysis, treatment failure was defined as virological failure (confirmed HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/ml) or discontinuation of abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine because of adverse events, consent withdrawal, or lost to follow-up. There were 143 (72.59%) patients with tenofovir/emtricitabine and 54 (27.41%) with abacavir/lamivudine. In the raltegravir group, there were three (11.11%) treatment failures with abacavir/lamivudine and eight (10.96%) with tenofovir/emtricitabine (estimated difference 0.15%; 95% CI -17.90 to 11.6). In the ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor group, there were four (14.81%) treatment failures with abacavir/lamivudine and 12 (17.14%) with tenofovir/emtricitabine (estimated difference -2.33%; 95% CI -16.10 to 16.70). Triglycerides decreased and HDL cholesterol increased through the study more pronouncedly with abacavir/lamivudine than with tenofovir/emtricitabine and differences in the total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio between both combinations of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) tended to be higher in the raltegravir group, although differences at 48 weeks were not significant. While no patient discontinued abacavir/lamivudine due to adverse events, four (2.80%) patients (all in the ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor group) discontinued tenofovir/emtricitabine because of adverse events (p=0.2744). The results of this analysis do not suggest that outcomes of abacavir/lamivudine are worse than those of tenofovir/emtricitabine when combined with raltegravir in virologically suppressed HIV-infected adults.
dc.format.extent7 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec627360
dc.identifier.issn0889-2229
dc.identifier.pmid22916715
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/56371
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc.
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/AID.2012.0150
dc.relation.ispartofAids Research and Human Retroviruses, 2012, vol. 29, num. 2, p. 235-241
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1089/AID.2012.0150
dc.rights(c) Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., 2012
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject.classificationInfeccions per VIH
dc.subject.classificationSida
dc.subject.classificationAntiretrovirals
dc.subject.otherHIV infections
dc.subject.otherAIDS (Disease)
dc.subject.otherAntiretroviral agents
dc.titleAbacavir/Lamivudine Versus Tenofovir/Emtricitabine in Virologically Suppressed Patients Switching from Ritonavir-Boosted Protease Inhibitors to Raltegravir
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
627360.pdf
Mida:
307.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format