Prehospital care for ovarian cancer in Catalonia: could we do better in primary care? Retrospective cohort study

dc.contributor.authorVela Vallespín, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorManchon Walsh, Paula
dc.contributor.authorAliste, Luisa
dc.contributor.authorBorràs Andrés, Josep Maria
dc.contributor.authorMarzo Castillejo, Mercè
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T12:51:01Z
dc.date.available2022-09-06T12:51:01Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-01
dc.date.updated2022-08-04T13:29:35Z
dc.description.abstractObjective To assess the impact of prehospital factors (diagnostic pathways, first presentation to healthcare services, intervals, participation in primary care) on 1-year and 5-year survival in people with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Design Retrospective quasi-population-based cohort study. Setting Catalan Integrated Public Healthcare System. Participants People with EOC who underwent surgery with a curative intent in public Catalan hospitals between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2014. Outcome measures Data from primary and secondary care clinical histories and care processes in the 18 months leading up to confirmation (signs and symptoms at presentation, diagnosis pathways, referrals, diagnosis interval) of the EOC diagnosis (stage, histology type, treatment). Diagnostic process intervals were based on the Aarhus statement. 1-year and 5-year survival analysis was undertaken. Results Of the 513 patients included in the cohort, 67.2% initially consulted their family physician, while 36.4% were diagnosed through emergency services. In the Cox models, survival was influenced by advanced stage at 1 year (HR 3.84, 95% CI 1.23 to 12.02) and 5 years (HR 5.36, 95% CI 3.07 to 9.36), as was the type of treatment received, although this association was attenuated over follow-up. Age became significant at 5 years of follow-up. After adjusting for age, adjusted morbidity groups, stage at diagnosis and treatment, 5-year survival was better in patients presenting with gynaecological bleeding (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.79). Survival was not associated with a starting point involving primary care (HR 1.39, 95% CI 0.93 to 2.09), diagnostic pathways involving referral to elective gynaecological care from non-general practitioners (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.26), or self-presentation to emergency services (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.31). Conclusions Survival in EOC is not associated with diagnostic pathways or prehospital healthcare, but it is influenced by stage at diagnosis, administration of primary cytoreduction plus chemotherapy and patient age.
dc.format.extent16 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec726216
dc.identifier.pmid35868821
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/188743
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMJ
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060499
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open, 2022, vol. 12, num. 7, p. e060499
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060499
dc.rightscc by-nc (c) Vela Vallespín, Carmen et al., 2022
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
dc.subject.classificationCàncer d'ovari
dc.subject.classificationAtenció primària
dc.subject.classificationEpidemiologia
dc.subject.otherOvarian cancer
dc.subject.otherPrimary care
dc.subject.otherEpidemiology
dc.titlePrehospital care for ovarian cancer in Catalonia: could we do better in primary care? Retrospective cohort study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
e060499.full.pdf
Mida:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format