The effectiveness of adjunct mindfulness-based intervention in treatment of bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorChu, Che Sheng
dc.contributor.authorStubbs, Brendon
dc.contributor.authorChen, Tien-Yu
dc.contributor.authorTang, Chia-Hung
dc.contributor.authorLi, Dian-Jeng
dc.contributor.authorYang, Wei Cheng
dc.contributor.authorWu, Ching Kuan
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, André F.
dc.contributor.authorVieta i Pascual, Eduard, 1963-
dc.contributor.authorMiklowitz, David J.
dc.contributor.authorTseng, Ping Tao
dc.contributor.authorLin, Pao Yen
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-28T12:12:27Z
dc.date.available2019-05-28T12:12:27Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01
dc.date.updated2019-05-28T12:12:27Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been increasingly used as an adjunctive treatment to pharmacotherapy for a few psychiatric disorders. However, few studies have investigated the efficacy of MBIs in bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of MBIs as an adjunctive treatment in BD. Major electronic databases were independently searched by two authors for controlled and uncontrolled studies which examined the effects of MBIs on psychiatric symptoms in subjects with BD. Data from original studies were synthesized by using a random effects model. RESULTS: Twelve trials were eligible for inclusion into current meta-analysis, including three controlled studies (n=132) and nine uncontrolled studies (n=142). In within-group analysis, MBIs significantly reduced depressive (7 studies, n=100, Hedges' g=0.58, p<0.001) and anxiety (4 studies, n=68, Hedges' g=0.34, p=0.043) symptoms, but not manic symptoms (6 studies, n=89, Hedges' g=0.09, p=0.488) and cognition (3 studies, n=43, Hedges' g=0.35, p=0.171), compared to baseline. In between-group analysis (intervention group versus waiting list group, all patients with BD), MBIs did not reduce depressive (3 studies, n=132, Hedges' g=0.46, p=0.315) or anxiety (3 studies, n=132, Hedges' g=0.33, p=0.578) symptoms. LIMITATIONS: Only three controlled trials compared MBIs to control conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed significantly beneficial effects on depressive and anxiety symptoms of BD patients in within-group analysis. However, this significance was not observed in comparison with the control groups. Further clinical trials are warranted to investigate the differences in the benefits of MBIs between treatment and control subjects.
dc.format.extent12 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec673281
dc.identifier.issn0165-0327
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/134025
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.025
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Affective Disorders, 2018, vol. 225, p. 234-245
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.025
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier B.V., 2018
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject.classificationTrastorn bipolar
dc.subject.classificationTeràpia cognitiva
dc.subject.classificationAnàlisi de conducta
dc.subject.otherManic-depressive illness
dc.subject.otherCognitive therapy
dc.subject.otherBehavioral assessment
dc.titleThe effectiveness of adjunct mindfulness-based intervention in treatment of bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
673281.pdf
Mida:
765.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format