Document type
ArticleVersion
Published versionPublication date
Publication license
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/206347
On moral impact and legal practice
Journal Title
Authors
Director/Tutor
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Related resource
Abstract
Some recent debates in general jurisprudence concern so-called 'moral impact ' theories of law, chiefly in the version proposed by Mark Greenberg. Greenberg provocatively portrays law as the moral impact of institutional action. He presents his 'moral impact' formula as the 'legally correct' way to figure out the law's content on the part of practitioners. His proposal has attracted some fine scholarship denouncing ambiguities within the account, and inconsistencies between the account and legal practice. Bill Watson takes these concerns a valuable step further. He argues that Greenberg's theory distorts not only what practitioners count as law, but also how they reason to that effect.
Subject (English)
Citation
Citation
KÖPCKE TINTURÉ, Maris. On moral impact and legal practice. Journal of the Things We Like (Lots). 2023. Vol. 2023. ISSN 2330-1295. [consulted: 10 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/206347