Amb motiu del tancament d'estiu, la validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 28 d'agost de 2026. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Con motivo del cierre de verano, la validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 28 de agosto de 2026. Disculpad las molestias
Due to the summer closure, document validation will resume starting August 28, 2026. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Document type

Article

Version

Published version

Publication date

Publication license

cc-by-nc-sa (c)  Köpcke, M., 2023
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/206347

On moral impact and legal practice

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Related resource

Abstract

Some recent debates in general jurisprudence concern so-called 'moral impact ' theories of law, chiefly in the version proposed by Mark Greenberg. Greenberg provocatively portrays law as the moral impact of institutional action. He presents his 'moral impact' formula as the 'legally correct' way to figure out the law's content on the part of practitioners. His proposal has attracted some fine scholarship denouncing ambiguities within the account, and inconsistencies between the account and legal practice. Bill Watson takes these concerns a valuable step further. He argues that Greenberg's theory distorts not only what practitioners count as law, but also how they reason to that effect.

Citation

Citation

KÖPCKE TINTURÉ, Maris. On moral impact and legal practice. Journal of the Things We Like (Lots). 2023. Vol. 2023. ISSN 2330-1295. [consulted: 10 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/206347

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record