Analysis of data collected in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Registry on a cohort of lymphoma patients receiving plerixafor

dc.contributor.authorSureda, Anna
dc.contributor.authorChabannon, Christian
dc.contributor.authorMasszi, Tamás
dc.contributor.authorPohlreich, David
dc.contributor.authorScheid, Christof
dc.contributor.authorThieblemont, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorWahlin, Björn E.
dc.contributor.authorSakellari, Ioanna
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Nigel
dc.contributor.authorJanikova, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorDabrowska-Iwanicka, Anna
dc.contributor.authorTouzeau, Cyrille
dc.contributor.authorEsquirol, Albert
dc.contributor.authorJantunen, Esa
dc.contributor.authorvan der Werf, Steffie
dc.contributor.authorBosman, Paul
dc.contributor.authorBoumendil, Ariane
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Qianying
dc.contributor.authorCelanovic, Marina
dc.contributor.authorMontoto, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorDreger, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-21T12:27:35Z
dc.date.available2021-01-21T12:27:35Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.updated2021-01-21T12:27:35Z
dc.description.abstractPlerixafor + granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is administered to patients with lymphoma who are poor mobilizers of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in Europe. This international, multicenter, non-interventional registry study (NCT01362972) evaluated long-term follow-up of patients with lymphoma who received plerixafor for HSC mobilization versus other mobilization methods. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance baseline characteristics between comparison groups. The following mobilization regimens were compared: G-CSF + plerixafor (G + P) versus G-CSF alone; G + P versus G-CSF + chemotherapy (G + C); and G-CSF + plerixafor + chemotherapy (G + P + C) versus G + C. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Overall, 313/3749 (8.3%) eligible patients were mobilized with plerixafor-containing regimens. After propensity score matching, 70 versus 36 patients were matched in the G + P versus G-CSF alone cohort, 124 versus 124 in the G + P versus G + C cohort, and 130 versus 130 in the G + P + C versus G + C cohort. For both PFS and OS, the upper bound of confidence interval for the hazard ratio was >1.3 for all comparisons, implying that non-inferiority was not demonstrated. No major differences in PFS, OS, and CIR were observed between the plerixafor and comparison groups.
dc.format.extent10 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec694442
dc.identifier.issn0268-3369
dc.identifier.pmid31570781
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/173318
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMacmillan Publishers Limited
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0693-z
dc.relation.ispartofBone Marrow Transplantation, 2020, vol. 55, p. 613-622
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-019-0693-z
dc.rightscc by (c) Sureda et al., 2020
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
dc.subject.classificationLimfomes
dc.subject.classificationCèl·lules mare
dc.subject.otherLymphomas
dc.subject.otherStem cells
dc.titleAnalysis of data collected in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Registry on a cohort of lymphoma patients receiving plerixafor
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
694442.pdf
Mida:
856.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format