Ethics and informed consent in clinical trial integrity: An international, multi-stakeholder consensus statement by Cairo Consensus Group

dc.contributor.authorFawzy, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Khalid Saeed
dc.contributor.authorChien, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorBueno Cavanillas, Aurora
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Díaz, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorZamora, Javier
dc.contributor.authorRuano Raviña, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorPacey, Allan
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jun Jim
dc.contributor.authorKhalaf, Yacoub
dc.contributor.authorSerour, Gamal
dc.contributor.authorAboulghar, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorSallam, Hassan
dc.contributor.authorSánchez, Vicente Martín
dc.contributor.authorMorris, R Katie
dc.contributor.authorOdibo, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorGrandi, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorWattar, Bassel
dc.contributor.authorBall, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorLecuona Ramírez, Itziar de
dc.contributor.authorHooft, Janneke van 't
dc.contributor.authorGeary, Michael
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, Jeffery
dc.contributor.authorWasim, Tayyiba
dc.contributor.authorMahran, Ali
dc.contributor.authorMignini, Luciano
dc.contributor.authorBedaiwy, Mohamed
dc.contributor.authorSoliman, Mohamed Yehia
dc.contributor.authorEl-Shalkany, Amr
dc.contributor.authorJawaid, Shaukat Ali
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Miland
dc.contributor.authorScott, James R
dc.contributor.authorIrfan Khawaja, Khadija
dc.contributor.authorElsuity, Mohamad A
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-22T11:05:07Z
dc.date.embargoEndDateinfo:eu-repo/date/embargoEnd/2026-08-12
dc.date.issued2025-08-13
dc.date.updated2026-01-22T11:05:07Z
dc.description.abstractRecent studies have revealed issues with ethical practice and informed consent in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We aimed to develop an international, multi-stakeholder consensus statement on human research ethics committee approval and informed participant consent for RCTs. The consensus process encompassed a systematic scoping review, modified two-round Delphi survey, and final consensus meeting of a multi-stakeholder group, including trialists, ethics committee members, methodologists, patient representatives, journal editors, and other experts on RCTs. Delphi consensus deployed the Average Percentage of Majority Opinions (APMO) threshold. There were 36 stakeholders from 12 countries in five continents. Delphi survey response rates were 67% (24/36 stakeholders) and 69% (25/36 stakeholders) in the first and second rounds, respectively. There were 135 statements (18 stakeholder-provided, 117 scoping review-generated) in the initial long list. Three additional statements were provided during the Delphi rounds. APMO threshold was 81.33% and 75.05% for the first and second Delphi rounds, respectively. Through consensus, the final set consolidated 77 statements in the following domains: general aspects (n = 11), journals' instructions and policies (n = 9), research institutions and funders' policies (n = 6), ethics committee regulations (n = 11), ethics committee evaluation and approval (n = 18), monitoring of informed consent procedures (n = 8), monitoring of trials for compliance (n = 3), post-publication concerns on ethics (n = 2), and recommendations for future research and development (n = 9). In conclusion, this international consensus statement provides a comprehensive integrity framework to address the unique challenges in RCT ethics and informed consent. It highlights the importance of robust ethics committee assessments, stakeholder training, patient engagement, and trial monitoring procedures.
dc.embargo.lift2026-08-12
dc.format.extent26 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec761140
dc.identifier.issn0020-7292
dc.identifier.pmid40801804
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/225942
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70374
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2025, vol. 172, num.2, p. 828-844
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70374
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier B.V., 2025
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject.classificationÈtica
dc.subject.classificationInvestigació mèdica
dc.subject.classificationIntegritat
dc.subject.classificationConsens (Ciències socials)
dc.subject.otherEthics
dc.subject.otherMedicine research
dc.subject.otherIntegrity
dc.subject.otherConsensus (Social sciences)
dc.titleEthics and informed consent in clinical trial integrity: An international, multi-stakeholder consensus statement by Cairo Consensus Group
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
902131.pdf
Mida:
521.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format