Influence of Connection Type and Platform Diameter on Titanium Dental Implants Fatigue: Non-Axial Loading Cyclic Test Analysis

dc.contributor.authorNicolás Silvente, Ana I.
dc.contributor.authorVelasco Ortega, Eugenio
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz García, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Guerra, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorMonsalve Guil, Loreto
dc.contributor.authorAyuso Montero, Raúl
dc.contributor.authorGil, Javier
dc.contributor.authorLópez López, José, 1958-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-13T09:13:02Z
dc.date.available2021-04-13T09:13:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-02
dc.date.updated2021-04-13T09:13:03Z
dc.description.abstractTwo-pieces dental implants must provide stability of the implant-abutment-interface. The connection type and platform diameter could influence the biomechanical resistance and stress distribution. This study aims to evaluate the fatigue for different types of connections, external and internal, and different platform diameters. Three implant designs with the same length were used: (a) external hexagon/narrow platform; (b) internal double hexagon/narrow platform; (c) internal octagon/regular platform. A fatigue test was developed to establish the number of cycles needed before fracture. A 30º oblique load with a sinusoidal function of fatigue at a frequency of 15 Hz and 10% stress variation was applied to each system. The fatigue load limit (FLL) for design (a) was 190N, being the nominal-curvature-moment (NCM) = 1.045; FLL = 150 N, with a NCM = 0.825 for (b), and FLL = 325 N, with a NCM = 1.788 for (c). The platform diameter affects the FLL, obtaining lower FLL on a narrow platform. The connection type interferes with the implant walls' width, especially in narrow implants, making internal connections more unstable at this level. Long-term clinical studies to assess the restoration's success rate and survival are mandatory.
dc.format.extent12 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec708849
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827
dc.identifier.pmid33276652
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/176252
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238988
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, vol. 17, num. 23, p. 8988
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238988
dc.rightscc-by (c) Nicolás Silvente, Ana I. et al., 2020
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
dc.subject.classificationImplants dentals
dc.subject.classificationAssaigs clínics
dc.subject.otherDental implants
dc.subject.otherClinical trials
dc.titleInfluence of Connection Type and Platform Diameter on Titanium Dental Implants Fatigue: Non-Axial Loading Cyclic Test Analysis
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
708849.pdf
Mida:
3.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format