Measurement uncertainty of β-lactam antibiotics results: estimation and clinical impact on therapeutic drug monitoring

dc.contributor.authorRigo Bonnin, Raúl
dc.contributor.authorCanalias, Francesca
dc.contributor.authorEl Haj Hidalgo, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Hernando, Maria Cristina
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Troyano, Noelia
dc.contributor.authorSoldevila-Boixader, Laura
dc.contributor.authorBenavent Palomares, Eva
dc.contributor.authorMurillo Rubio, Óscar
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-07T15:49:35Z
dc.date.available2022-04-07T15:49:35Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.date.updated2022-04-07T15:49:35Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite that measurement uncertainty data should facilitate an appropriate interpretation of measured values, there are actually few reported by clinical laboratories. We aimed to estimate the measurement uncertainty of some β-lactam antibiotics (β-LA), and to evaluate the impact of reporting the measurement uncertainty on clinicians' decisions while guiding antibiotic therapy. Methods: Measurement uncertainty of β-LA (aztreonam [ATM], cefepime [FEP], ceftazidime [CAZ], and piperacillin [PIP]) values, obtained by an UHPLC-MS/MS based-method, was estimated using the top-down approach called the single laboratory validation approach (EUROLAB guidelines). Main uncertainty sources considered were related to calibrators' assigned values, the intermediate precision, and the bias. As part of an institutional program, patients with osteoarticular infections are treated with β-LA in continuous infusion and monitored to assure values at least 4 times over the minimal inhibitory concentration (4×MIC). We retrospectively evaluated the impact of two scenarios of laboratory reports on clinicians' expected decisions while monitoring the treatment: reports containing only the β-LA values, or including the β-LA coverage intervals (β-LA values and their expanded measurement uncertainties). Results The relative expanded uncertainties for ATM, FEP, CAZ and PIP were lower than 26.7%, 26.4%, 28.8%, and 25.5%, respectively. Reporting the measurement uncertainty, we identified that clinicians may modify their decision especially in cases where 4×MIC values were within the β-LA coverage intervals. Conclusions: This study provides a simple method to estimate the measurement uncertainty of β-LA values that can be easily applied in clinical laboratories. Further studies should confirm the potential impact of reporting measurement uncertainty on clinicians' decision-making while guiding antibiotic therapy.
dc.format.extent11 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec698954
dc.identifier.issn1434-6621
dc.identifier.pmid31469649
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/184833
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0621
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2020, vol. 58, num. 2, p. 240-250
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0621
dc.rights(c) Walter de Gruyter, 2020
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
dc.subject.classificationAntibiòtics betalactàmics
dc.subject.classificationFarmacovigilància
dc.subject.classificationCromatografia de líquids d'alta resolució
dc.subject.classificationMedicaments antibacterians
dc.subject.otherBeta lactam antibiotics
dc.subject.otherDrug monitoring
dc.subject.otherHigh performance liquid chromatography
dc.subject.otherAntibacterial agents
dc.titleMeasurement uncertainty of β-lactam antibiotics results: estimation and clinical impact on therapeutic drug monitoring
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
698954.pdf
Mida:
426.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format