Amb motiu del tancament d'estiu, la validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 28 d'agost de 2026. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Con motivo del cierre de verano, la validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 28 de agosto de 2026. Disculpad las molestias
Due to the summer closure, document validation will resume starting August 28, 2026. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Fitxers

938432.pdf (291.91 KB)

Embargament

Document embargat fins el 2027-03-31

Tipus de document

Article

Versió

Versió acceptada

Data de publicació

2026-04-01

Tots els drets reservats

Si us plau utilitzeu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest document: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/230894

Short-term Safety of one Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Versus Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S): 30-day Results from the OASIS trial.

Títol de la revista

Autors

Director/Tutor

ISSN de la revista

Títol del volum

Recurs relacionat

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-026-08543-2

Resum

BACKGROUND: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is an effective treatment for obesity, but selecting the optimal technique remains challenging. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) and Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S) are increasingly used, yet direct comparisons are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To compare 30-day outcomes of OAGB and SADI-S in patients with a BMI of 45–50 kg/m², focusing on safety and short-term efficacy within the OASIS trial. METHODS: In this randomized, single-blind trial, 89 patients underwent laparoscopic OAGB (n = 48) or SADI-S (n = 41). The primary endpoint is 5-year weight loss; this manuscript reports a planned 30-day safety analysis. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale. Secondary outcomes included operative time, hospital stay, and early weight loss. RESULTS: Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) occurred in 7.3% of SADI-S and 2.1% of OAGB patients (p = 0.33). Reoperations were also more common in SADI-S (7.3% vs. 2.1%; p = 0.33). Operative time was significantly longer for SADI-S (103.8 ± 18.4 vs. 82.2 ± 23.9 min; p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in early weight loss or comorbidity resolution. No 30-day mortality was recorded. CONCLUSIONS: OAGB was associated with fewer complications and shorter operative times compared to SADI-S, although differences in severe complications and reoperations were not statistically significant. Long-term data are needed to fully evaluate outcomes.

Matèries

Obesitat, Cirurgia, Complicacions (Medicina)

Matèries (anglès)

Obesity, Surgery, Complications (Medicine)

Citació

Col·leccions

Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)

Citació

LOPEZ GONZALEZ, Ruth, et al. Short-term Safety of one Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Versus Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADI-S): 30-day Results from the OASIS trial. Obesity Surgery. 2026. Vol. 36, num. 4, pags. 1583-1589. ISSN 0960-8923. [consulted: 19 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/230894

Exportar metadades

JSON - METS

Compartir registre