Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the surface of implants: a descriptive comparative study of 3 different tips and pulse energies

dc.contributor.authorChegeni, Ehsan
dc.contributor.authorEspaña Tost, A. J. (Antonio Jesús)
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa de Figueiredo, Rui Pedro
dc.contributor.authorValmaseda Castellón, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorArnabat Domínguez, Josep
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-02T12:23:19Z
dc.date.available2021-02-02T12:23:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-30
dc.date.updated2021-02-02T12:23:20Z
dc.description.abstractPeri-implant diseases are one of the main complications of dental implants. There are no well-established guidelines regarding laser parameters for implant decontamination. The aim was to compare two different settings of irradiation of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser on dental implants regarding surface alterations and determine the best settings for less damage on the surface. An in vitro study was performed and 30 areas of dental implants were irradiated with two different regimes of energy per pulse 50 and 84 mJ (1.5 W/30 Hz and 2.5 W/30 Hz). A total of 30 sites of implants were irradiated with three different tips (10 surfaces per tip): conical (RTF3-17 mm), side firing (SFT8-18 mm) and cylindrical (MGG6-6 mm). The following descriptive classification on surface damage was employed: no damage (class A), minimal effects (class B), metal fall with melting (class C), and destruction with carbonization (class D). The assessment was made through a descriptive scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. Side firing and conical tips at 50 mJ were classified as class A. Side firing at 84 mJ and cylindrical tips 50 mJ and 84 mJ were classified as class B. Finally, class C defects were found in the areas where the conical tip was used at 84 mJ. Side firing and conical tips at 50 mJ do not seem to damage the implant surface.
dc.format.extent10 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec703687
dc.identifier.issn2304-6767
dc.identifier.pmid33008108
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/173596
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8040109
dc.relation.ispartofDentistry Journal (MDPI), 2020, vol. 8, num. 4, p. 109-118
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/dj8040109
dc.rightscc-by (c) Chegeni, Ehsan et al., 2020
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
dc.subject.classificationLàsers
dc.subject.classificationImplants dentals
dc.subject.classificationMucosa oral
dc.subject.otherLasers
dc.subject.otherDental implants
dc.subject.otherOral mucosa
dc.titleEffect of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the surface of implants: a descriptive comparative study of 3 different tips and pulse energies
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
703687.pdf
Mida:
6.5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format