Comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona

dc.contributor.authorGómez i Prat, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorPeremiquel Trillas, Paula
dc.contributor.authorClaveria Guiu, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorCaro Mendivelso, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorChoque, Estefa
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Juan José de los
dc.contributor.authorSulleiro, Elena
dc.contributor.authorEssadek, Hakima Ouaarab
dc.contributor.authorAlbajar Viñas, Pere
dc.contributor.authorAscaso Terrén, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-28T12:33:50Z
dc.date.available2021-01-28T12:33:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-14
dc.date.updated2021-01-25T08:10:51Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Chagas disease presents bio-psycho-social and cultural determinants for infected patients, their family members, close friends, and society. For this reason, diagnosis and treatment require an active approach and an integral focus, so that we can prevent the disease from creating stigma and exclusion, as is actively promoting access to diagnosis, medical attention and social integration. Methodology: The study was conducted in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain) from 2004 to 2017. After an increased detection rates of CHD in our region, the process of construction of community strategies started (2004-2013). Different community interventions with informational, educational, and communication components were designed, developed, implemented, and evaluated. The results of the evaluation helped to determine which intervention should be prioritized: 1) workshop; 2) community event; 3) in situ screening. Afterwards, those strategies were implemented (2014-2017). Results: Each of the three strategies resulted in a different level of coverage, or number of people reached. Thein situscreening interventions reached the highest coverage (956 persons, 58.98%). Clear differences exist (p-value<0.001) between the three strategies regarding the percentage of screenings and diagnoses carried out. The largest number was in thein situscreening intervention, with a total of 830 persons screened despite the greatest number of diagnoses was among the workshop participants (33 persons, 20.75% of those screened). The prevalence of infection found is similar among the three strategies, ranging from 16.63% to 22.32% of the screened patients (p-value= 0.325). Conclusions: The results of the study show that community interventions seem to be necessary to improve access to diagnosis and treatment of CHD in the area of Barcelona. They also show which strategy is the most appropriate based on the detected needs of the community, the proposed objectives of the intervention, and the given socio-temporal context.
dc.format.extent15 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec709866
dc.identifier.pmid32663211
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/173476
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235466
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS One, 2020, vol. 15, num. 7, p. e0235466
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235466
dc.rightscc by (c) Gómez i Prat et al., 2020
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Fonaments Clínics)
dc.subject.classificationMalaltia de Chagas
dc.subject.classificationMigrants
dc.subject.otherChagas' disease
dc.subject.otherImmigrants
dc.titleComparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
PratJGI.pdf
Mida:
509.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format