Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/223676
Title: Atlas of Gray Matter Volume Differences Across Psychiatric Conditions: A Systematic Review With a Novel Meta-Analysis That Considers Co-Occurring Disorders
Author: Fortea, Lydia
Ortuño, María
Prisco, Michele de
Oliva, Vincenzo
Albajes Eizagirre, Anton
Fortea, Adriana
Madero García, Santiago
Solanes, Aleix
Vilajosana, Enric
Yao, Yuanwei
Fabro, Lorenzo del
Solé, Eduard
Verdolini, Norma
Farré Colomés, Álvar
Serra Blasco, María
Picó Pérez, Maria
Lukito, Steve
Wise, Toby
Carlisi, Christina
Arnone, Danilo
Kempton, Matthew J.
Hauson, Alexander O.
Wollman, Scott C.
Soriano Mas, Carles
Rubia, Katya
Norman, Luke
Fusar-Poli, Paolo
Mataix-Cols, David
Valentí Ribas, Marc
Via Virgili, Esther
Cardoner, N. (Narcís)
Solmi, Marco
Zhang, Jintao
Pan, PingLei
Shin, Jae I.
Fullana Rivas, Miguel Àngel
Vieta i Pascual, Eduard, 1963-
Radua, Joaquim
Keywords: Neuropsiquiatria
Mapatge del cervell
Psiquiatria biològica
Neuropsychiatry
Brain mapping
Biological psychiatry
Issue Date: 1-Jul-2025
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Abstract: Background Regional gray matter volume (GMV) differences between individuals with mental disorders and comparison participants may be confounded by co-occurring disorders. To disentangle disorder-specific GMV correlates, we conducted a large-scale multidisorder meta-analysis using a novel approach that explicitly models co-occurring disorders. Methods We systematically reviewed voxel-based morphometry studies indexed in PubMed and Scopus up to January 2023 that compared adults with major mental disorders (anorexia nervosa, schizophrenia spectrum, anxiety, bipolar, major depressive, obsessive-compulsive, and posttraumatic stress disorders plus attention-deficit/hyperactivity, autism spectrum, and borderline personality disorders) with comparison participants. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We derived GMV correlates for each disorder using: 1) a multidisorder meta-analysis that accounted for all co-occurring mental disorders simultaneously and 2) separate standard meta-analyses for each disorder in which co-occurring disorders were ignored. We assessed the alterations’ extent, intensity (effect size), and specificity (interdisorder correlations and transdiagnostic alterations) for both approaches. Results We included 433 studies (499 datasets) involving 19,718 patients and 16,441 comparison participants (51% female, ages 20–67 years). We provide GMV correlate maps for each disorder using both approaches. The novel approach, which accounted for co-occurring disorders, produced GMV correlates that were more focal and disorder specific (less correlated across disorders and fewer transdiagnostic abnormalities).
Note: Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.10.020
It is part of: Biological Psychiatry, 2025, vol. 98, num.1, p. 76-90
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/223676
Related resource: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.10.020
ISSN: 0006-3223
Appears in Collections:Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
875406.pdf1.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons