Document type

Article

Version

Published version

Publication date

Publication license

cc-by-nc-nd (c) Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid, 2020
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/178390

Assessing risk and protective factors in clinical and judicial child-to-parent violence cases

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

Child-to-parent violence takes different forms (physical, psychological or economic) and can be addressed in the judicial system or in clinical practice. The current paper compares 61 clinical and 30 judicialized cases that were evaluated using the Child-to-Parent Violence Risk assessment tool (CPVR). Results showed a higher prevalence of risk factors in the judicialsample. This group of aggressors had worse profiles of violence (bidirectionality of the parent/child violence, violenceother than CPV, and more CPV complaints), more psychological issues (low frustration tolerance, little anger management, narcissism, and violent attitudes) and, most notably, more dysfunctional families (violence between parents, cohabitationproblems, inversion of the hierarchy, non-violent conflicts, and even criminal history of the parents). Logistic regressionshowed that narcissism, attitudes justifying violence, violence between parents, and problems of parents themselves(such mental disorders or drug abuse) allowed for correct classification of 89.4% of cases. Total CPVR scores differedbetween groups (25.8 vs. 14.2), and classification was good for both type of group (AUC = .830) and injuries to mother (AUC= .764). A cut-off score between 22 and 23 showed the best results in prediction of group and injuries to mother. Utility ofthe CPVR, and next steps in its development are discussed.

Citation

Citation

LOINAZ CALVO, Ismael and DE SOUSA, Ava Ma. Assessing risk and protective factors in clinical and judicial child-to-parent violence cases. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context. 2020. Vol. 12, num. 1, pags. 43-51. ISSN 1889-1861. [consulted: 13 of June of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/178390

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record