Fear learning in unmedicated patients with anxiety disorders: a comparison of delay conditioning, fear reversal, and trace conditioning

dc.contributor.authorVilajosana, Enric
dc.contributor.authorBattaglia, Simone
dc.contributor.authorChavarría-Elizondo, Pamela
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Zalacaín, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorJuaneda-Seguí, Asier
dc.contributor.authorSaiz-Masvidal, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorPeña Arteaga, Víctor de la
dc.contributor.authorShackman, Alexander J.
dc.contributor.authorRadua, Joaquim
dc.contributor.authorSoriano Mas, Carles
dc.contributor.authorFullana Rivas, Miguel Àngel
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-30T16:08:53Z
dc.date.available2026-06-30T16:08:53Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-02
dc.date.updated2026-06-30T16:08:57Z
dc.description.abstractAnxiety disorders are common and impairing, yet their underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Fear learning provides a critical translational framework for investigating pathological anxiety, bridging laboratory models and clinical phenomena. Prior studies have been limited by important methodological issues, including the inclusion of non-anxiety diagnoses, high comorbidity, and medication use. Here we examined three forms of fear learning- delay conditioning, fear reversal, and trace conditioning-in unmedicated adults with minimally comorbid primary anxiety disorders (Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Social Anxiety Disorder; n = 34) and demographically matched controls (n = 102). Individuals with anxiety disorders showed greater psychophysiological arousal (skin conductance responses) and reduced brain activation (assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging) in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to the learned safety cue (CS - ) during the early phase of delay conditioning. Differences between individuals with anxiety disorders and controls were not evident for the learned threat versus learned safety (CS+ versus CS - ) contrasts during delay conditioning, fear-reversal, or trace conditioning in psychophysiological arousal, brain activation, or subjective ratings. Taken together, these observations underscore the selectivity of Pavlovian learning deficits among unmedicated individuals with anxiety disorders and highlight differences in learning or using safety-related information to adaptively regulate fear.
dc.format.extent11 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec770694
dc.identifier.issn2158-3188
dc.identifier.pmid41927553
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/230318
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-026-03996-6
dc.relation.ispartofTranslational Psychiatry, 2026, vol. 16, num.1
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-026-03996-6
dc.rightscc-by (c) Vilajosana, Enric et al., 2026
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject.classificationAnsietat
dc.subject.classificationImatges per ressonància magnètica
dc.subject.classificationFòbia social
dc.subject.otherAnxiety
dc.subject.otherMagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subject.otherSocial phobia
dc.titleFear learning in unmedicated patients with anxiety disorders: a comparison of delay conditioning, fear reversal, and trace conditioning
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
939369.pdf
Mida:
1.89 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format