Case-finding in primary care for coeliac disease: Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of a rapid point-of-care test

dc.contributor.authorEsteve i Comas, Maria
dc.contributor.authorRosinach, Mercè
dc.contributor.authorLlordés, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorCalpe, Judit
dc.contributor.authorMontserrat, Glòria
dc.contributor.authorPujals, Mar
dc.contributor.authorCela, Abel
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco García, Anna
dc.contributor.authorIbarra, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Ramirez, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorTristán, Eva
dc.contributor.authorArau, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorFerrer, Carme
dc.contributor.authorMariné, Meritxell
dc.contributor.authorRibes Puig, Josepa
dc.contributor.authorFernández Bañares, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorPrimary Care Coeliac Disease Study Group
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-01T13:45:19Z
dc.date.available2020-12-01T13:45:19Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-01
dc.date.updated2020-12-01T13:45:19Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: An on-site, rapid, fingertip, whole-blood point-of-care test (POCT) is attractive for active case-finding of coeliac disease (CD) in primary care because of its simplicity. Aim: The aim of this article is to assess the usefulness and cost-effectiveness of adult case-finding using a POCT based on deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies (IgA/IgG-DGP) in primary care for CD diagnosis. Methods: A case-finding study for CD was conducted by using an easy-to-use, on-site, whole-blood for IgA/IgG-DGP-based fingertip POCT compared with tTG2 in 350 individuals. Sample size was calculated based on 0.28% prevalence in the reference population. Duodenal biopsies for histology, intraepithelial lymphocytes and in situ deposition of tTG2 were obtained if tTG2 and/or POCT were positive. Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of strategies using serology or POCT were calculated. Results: Prevalence of CD was 1.14% (95% CI, 0.3-3.4), almost double what was previously observed. Four patients were diagnosed with CD. tTG2 was positive in three (0.85%) and POCT in 29 (8.2%). Sensitivity of POCT for CD was 100%, specificity 93%, PPV 14%, and NPV 100%. POCT followed by duodenal biopsy was the most cost-effective approach in our setting (standard diagnosis: E13,033/case; POCT þ duodenal biopsy: E7360/case). Conclusions: A negative POCT allows ruling out CD in primary care, making it suitable for case-finding. POCT strategy was the most cost effective.
dc.format.extent11 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec684837
dc.identifier.issn2050-6406
dc.identifier.pmid30023063
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/172457
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640618761700
dc.relation.ispartofUnited European Gastroenterology Journal, 2018, vol. 6, num. 6, p. 855-865
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/2050640618761700
dc.rightscc by-nc (c) Esteve i Comas, Maria et al., 2018
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/es/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
dc.subject.classificationMalaltia celíaca
dc.subject.classificationDiagnòstic
dc.subject.otherCeliac disease
dc.subject.otherDiagnosis
dc.titleCase-finding in primary care for coeliac disease: Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of a rapid point-of-care test
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
684837.pdf
Mida:
510.73 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format