Effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorPérez Lacasta, María José
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Alonso, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Martínez, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorSala, Maria
dc.contributor.authorPerestelo Pérez, Lilisbeth
dc.contributor.authorVidal Lancis, Maria Carmen
dc.contributor.authorCodern Bové, Núria
dc.contributor.authorFeijoo Cid, Maria
dc.contributor.authorToledo Chávarri, Ana
dc.contributor.authorCardona, Àngels
dc.contributor.authorPons, Anna
dc.contributor.authorCarles Lavila, Misericòrdia
dc.contributor.authorRue, Montserrat
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-29T08:13:17Z
dc.date.available2020-10-29T08:13:17Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.date.updated2020-10-26T09:24:49Z
dc.description.abstractBackground In Spain, women invited to breast screening are not usually informed about potential harms of screening. The objective of the InforMa study is to assess the effect of receiving information about the benefits and harms of breast screening on informed choice and other decision-making outcomes, in women approaching the age of invitation to mammography screening. Methods Two-stage randomised controlled trial. In the first stage, 40 elementary territorial units of the public healthcare system were selected and randomised to intervention or control. In the second stage, women aged 49-50 years were randomly selected. The target sample size was 400 women. Women in the intervention arm received a decision aid (DA) with detailed information on the benefits and harms of screening. Women in the control arm received a standard leaflet that did not mention harms and recommended accepting the invitation to participate in the Breast Cancer Screening Program (BCSP). The primary outcome was informed choice, defined as adequate knowledge and intentions consistent with attitudes. Secondary outcomes included decisional conflict, worry about breast cancer, time perspective, opinions about the DA or the leaflet, and participation in the BCSP. Results In the intervention group, 23.2% of 203 women made an informed choice compared to only 0.5% of 197 women in the control group (p < 0.001). Attitudes and intentions were similar in both study groups with a high frequency of women intending to be screened, 82.8% vs 82.2% (p = 0.893). Decisional conflict was significantly lower in the intervention group. No differences were observed in confidence in the decision, anxiety, and participation in BCSP. Conclusions Women in Spain lack knowledge on the benefits and harms of breast screening. Providing quantitative information on benefits and harms has produced a considerable increase in knowledge and informed choice, with a high acceptance of the informative materials.
dc.format.extent20 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.pmid30913217
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/171602
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library Science
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214057
dc.relation.ispartofPlos One, 2019-01-01, Vol. 14, Issue 3
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214057
dc.rightscc by (c) Pérez Lacasta, María José et al., 2019
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
dc.subject.classificationAssaigs clínics
dc.subject.classificationMamografia
dc.subject.otherClinical trials
dc.subject.otherMammography
dc.titleEffect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
Perez-LacastaMJ.pdf
Mida:
932.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format