Study of two MTA cements

dc.contributor.authorBerástegui, Esther
dc.contributor.authorValmaseda Castellón, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorFaus, Vicente
dc.contributor.authorBallester Palacios, M. L. (Maria Lluïsa)
dc.contributor.authorBerini Aytés, Leonardo
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-10T12:33:12Z
dc.date.available2015-11-10T12:33:12Z
dc.date.issued2014-11-01
dc.date.updated2015-11-10T12:33:12Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: To determine and compare the pH, conductivity and calcium release of an experimental Portland cement (PE) consisting of trioxid mineral aggregate and a comercially available modified Portland cement (C.P.M.) after 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 15 and 30 days. Material and Methods: Cements were mixed following the manufacturer's instructions, with a powder: liquid ratio of 3:1. Each cement was placed in 12 PVC tubes 1 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length and allowed to set. Four empty tubes were used as negative controls. Tubes were submerged in plastic flasks containing 10 ml deionized water and stored at 37ºC and 100% humidity. After 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 10, 15 and 30 days tubes were removed from the flasks and these were refilled with deionized water. We measured pH, conductivity and calcium content of the recovered solution. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Results: pH was 0.3 units more alkaline with PE cement (p=0.023). pH experienced a slight decrease with time (p<0.001), independently of the cement type (p>0.05). Conductivity of PE and CPM cements diminished at 4 days and almost recovered at 30 days (p<0.001). PE cement had a higher conductivity (p<0.001). Calcium reléase diminished from the first day and recovered at 30 days (p<0.001) similarly for both cements (p>0.05). Conclusions: PE cement raised pH slightly more and had higher conductivity than CPM. Calcium release diminished after the first day and recovered at 30 days, similarly for both cements.
dc.format.extent5 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec642392
dc.identifier.issn1698-4447
dc.identifier.pmid25350596
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/67724
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMedicina Oral SL
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.19936
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, 2014, vol. 19 , num. 6, p. 634-638
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/doi:10.4317/medoral.19936
dc.rights(c) Medicina Oral SL, 2014
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
dc.subject.classificationMaterials dentals
dc.subject.classificationCiment
dc.subject.classificationCalci
dc.subject.classificationEndodòncia
dc.subject.otherDental materials
dc.subject.otherCement
dc.subject.otherCalcium
dc.subject.otherEndodontics
dc.titleStudy of two MTA cements
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
642392.pdf
Mida:
550.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format