Amb motiu del tancament d'estiu, la validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 28 d'agost de 2026. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Con motivo del cierre de verano, la validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 28 de agosto de 2026. Disculpad las molestias
Due to the summer closure, document validation will resume starting August 28, 2026. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Document type

Article

Version

Published version

Publication date

Publication license

cc-by (c)  Laín, B., 2024
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/218144

Addressing the Sharing Economy—Some (Potential) Inconsistencies of Its Emancipatory Defense

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

The sharing economy (SE) is a strongly contested idea, both conceptually and politically. This paper first explores multiple existing definitions, emphasizing the challenges in both conceptual and operational terms they usually entail. It is argued that most of the common definitions tend to exacerbate tensions between informativeness and veracity, resulting in the SE becoming a catchall concept. Alternatively, it is often suggested to operationalize the concept by breaking it down among its main areas, such as consumption, knowledge, production, and finance. However, these kinds of classifications lack logical-formal consistency and substantive validity. The paper then addresses the political-normative debate by briefly presenting the three main existing perspectives on the SE: (i) as a more inclusive form of capitalism, (ii) as the advancement of the neoliberal agenda, and (iii) as a sort of emancipatory economy. The primary aim of this paper, however, is not to advocate for a singular viewpoint or scrutinize any particular author’s theory, but to examine three common errors that the emancipatory conception may easily fall into: (i) overemphasizing the role of communities in economic activity, (ii) attributing an inherent collaborative propensity to individuals, and (iii) understanding markets from an a-institutional and psychological standpoint. The conclusions suggest that to truly realize the emancipatory potential of the SE, the conception should distance itself from standard economic theory and adopt a more institutional approach akin to classical political economy.

Subject (English)

Citation

Citation

LAIN ESCANDELL, Bru. Addressing the Sharing Economy—Some (Potential) Inconsistencies of Its Emancipatory Defense. Philosophies. 2024. Vol. 9, num. 6, pags. 180-196. [consulted: 7 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/218144

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record