Sneaky Assertions

dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Carpintero, Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-31T09:48:04Z
dc.date.available2020-12-31T06:10:20Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-31
dc.date.updated2020-03-31T09:48:04Z
dc.description.abstractSome speech acts are made indirectly. It is thus natural to think that assertions could also be made indirectly. Grice's conversational implicatures appear to be just a case of this, in which one indirectly makes an assertion or a related constative act by means of a declarative sentence. Several arguments, however, have been given against indirect assertions, by Davis (1999), Fricker (2012), Green (2007, 2015), Lepore & Stone (2010, 2015) and others. This paper confronts and rejects three considerations that have been made: arguments based on the distinction between lying and misleading; arguments based on the ordinary concept of assertion; and arguments based on the testimonial knowledge that assertions provide.
dc.format.extent31 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec683172
dc.identifier.issn1520-8583
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/154486
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12116
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophical Perspectives, 2018, vol. 32, num. 1, p. 188-218
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12116
dc.rights(c) John Wiley & Sons, 2018
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)
dc.subject.classificationFilosofia del llenguatge
dc.subject.classificationSemàntica (Filosofia)
dc.subject.otherPhilosophy of language
dc.subject.otherSemantics (Philosophy)
dc.titleSneaky Assertions
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
683172.pdf
Mida:
361.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format