Avui, dilluns 8 de juny, el Dipòsit Digital no estarà operatiu de 15:00 a 17:00 h per tasques de manteniment. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Hoy, lunes 8 de junio, el Dipòsit Digital no estará operativo de 15:00 a 17:00 h debido a tareas de mantenimiento. Disculpen las molestias.
Today, Monday, Jun 8th, the Digital Repository will be unavailable due to a system update.

Document type

Article

Version

Published version

Publication date

Publication license

cc by (c) Ruprecht, Ario et al., 2022
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/190173

Measurements of Particulate Matter from Electronic and Conventional Cigarettes: A Comparative Analysis of Methods

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

Due to the growing popularity of electronic cigarettes (ECs) and heated tobacco products (HTPs) as alternatives to conventional cigarettes (CCs), there is an increasing need to monitor the emissions of these new devices. ECs generate significant concentrations of second-hand aerosol (ECSHA), which is visible in dense clouds and can be smelled. Particulate matter (PM) is an important component of CC, HTP and EC aerosols, and Optical Particle Counters (OPCs) enable its real-time measurement, which is expressed either as the number of particles or as mass. This study specifically addresses the limitations associated with EC mass measurement using OPC technology and identifies the strict necessity of the measurement of a corresponding density (k factor) not only for each specific PM source but also for the desired PM size. Therefore, a standard measurement requires the simultaneous operation of the OPC equipment and a certified reference instrument. Four different OPCs were used. Crucially, this study also proves that this setup may be inapplicable because the extreme volatility of EC-generated aerosols makes it impractical to gauge the correct EC k factor.

Subject (English)

Citation

Citation

RUPRECHT, Ario, et al. Measurements of Particulate Matter from Electronic and Conventional Cigarettes: A Comparative Analysis of Methods. Atmosphere. 2022. Vol. 13, num. 9, pags. 1393. ISSN 2073-4433. [consulted: 9 of June of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/190173

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record