Relationship between unilateral posterior crossbite and human static body posture

dc.contributor.authorZurita Hernández, Jorge Manuel
dc.contributor.authorAyuso Montero, Raúl
dc.contributor.authorCuartero Balañá, Meritxell
dc.contributor.authorWillaert Jiménez-Pajarero, Eva
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Gomis, Jordi
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-29T12:13:04Z
dc.date.available2021-01-29T12:13:04Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-23
dc.date.updated2021-01-29T12:13:04Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: We compared photogrammetry-assessed body posture between young adults with and without unilateral posterior crossbite (UPCB). Assessments were controlled by vision, mandibular position and sitting/standing position. In addition, we aimed to determine the relationship between UPCB laterality and the direction of body posture using photogrammetry and a static postural platform. Methods: Adults with natural dentition, with and without UPCB, were enrolled. Static body posture was assessed by photogrammetry based on horizontal acromial alignment and horizontal anterior-superior iliac spine (ASIS) alignment. Frontal photographs were taken with participants asked to open or close their eyes and hold their jaws at rest, at an intercuspal position, and at left or right lateral positions. Distribution of foot pressure was recorded using a static postural platform at different visual input and mandibular positions. General linear models with repeated measures were used to assess the effect of the various within- and between-subject factors. Results: In total, 36 adults (left UPCB = 12; Right UPCB = 6; controls = 18) participated. There were significant differences between the control and UPCB groups in horizontal alignment at the acromion (p = 0.035) and ASIS (p = 0.026) levels when controlled by visual input and mandibular position. No significant differences in horizontal alignment or foot pressure distribution were observed by laterality in the UPCB group. Conclusion: The presence of UPCB affects static body posture, but the side of crossbite is not related to the direction of effect on static body posture.
dc.format.extent10 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec702706
dc.identifier.issn1661-7827
dc.identifier.pmid32717988
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/173523
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155303
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, vol. 17, num. 15, p. 5303
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155303
dc.rightscc-by (c) Zurita Hernández, Jorge et al., 2020
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
dc.subject.classificationOclusió dental
dc.subject.classificationPostura humana
dc.subject.otherDental occlusion
dc.subject.otherPosture
dc.titleRelationship between unilateral posterior crossbite and human static body posture
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
702706.pdf
Mida:
1.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format