Eliciting critical care nurses' beliefs regarding physical restraint use

dc.contributor.authorVia-Clavero, Gemma
dc.contributor.authorSanjuán-Naváis, Marta
dc.contributor.authorRomero García, Marta
dc.contributor.authorCueva Ariza, Laura de la
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Estalella, Gemma
dc.contributor.authorPlata Menchaca, Erika
dc.contributor.authorDelgado-Hito, Pilar
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-13T18:44:11Z
dc.date.available2026-01-13T18:44:11Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-01
dc.date.updated2026-01-13T18:44:11Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite the reported harms and ethical concerns about physical restraint use in the critical care settings, nurses' intention to apply them is unequal across countries. According to the theory of planned behaviour, eliciting nurses' beliefs regarding the use of physical restraints, would provide additional social information about nurses' intention to perform this practice. Aim: To explore the salient behavioural, normative and control beliefs underlying the intention of critical care nurses to use physical restraints from the theory of planned behaviour. Research design: A belief elicitation study was conducted. Participants and research context: Twenty-six critical care nurses were purposively sampled across gender, work shift patterns and professional experience in five intensive care units of three hospitals in Spain. Data were obtained from a nine-item open-ended questionnaire and a focus group. Deductive content analysis was performed. Ethical considerations: Ethical approval was obtained from the hospital ethics committee. Participants were assured their participation was voluntary. Findings: Nurses framed the use of restraints as a way of prioritising patients' physical safety. They referred to contextual factors as the main reasons to justify their application. Nurses perceived that their decision is approved by other colleagues and the patients' relatives. Some nurses started advocating against their use, but felt powerless to change this unsafe practice within an unfavourable climate. Control beliefs were linked to patient's medical condition, availability of alternative solutions, analgo-sedation policies and work organisation. Discussion: Safety arguments based on the surrounding work environment were discussed. Conclusion: Nurses' behavioural and control beliefs were related. Nurses should be trained in alternatives to PR use. The impact of analgo-sedation protocols, relatives' involvement, leadership support and ICU restraint policies on PR practices need to be revised. Further research is required to explore why nurses do not act with moral courage to change this harmful practice. Keywords: Restraint Physical, attitude, intention, intensive care units, nurses, qualitative research.
dc.format.extent15 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec676290
dc.identifier.issn0969-7330
dc.identifier.pmid29495933
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/225423
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017752547
dc.relation.ispartofNursing Ethics An International Journal for Health Care Professionals, 2019, vol. 26, num.5, p. 1458-1472
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017752547
dc.rights(c) Via-Clavero,G. et al., 2019
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Infermeria Fonamental i Clínica)
dc.subject.classificationInfermeria en cures intensives
dc.subject.classificationUnitats de cures intensives
dc.subject.classificationInvestigació qualitativa
dc.subject.otherIntensive care nursing
dc.subject.otherIntensive care units
dc.subject.otherQualitative research
dc.titleEliciting critical care nurses' beliefs regarding physical restraint use
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
205799.pdf
Mida:
289.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format