Amb motiu del tancament d'estiu, la validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 28 d'agost de 2026. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Con motivo del cierre de verano, la validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 28 de agosto de 2026. Disculpad las molestias
Due to the summer closure, document validation will resume starting August 28, 2026. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Files

872793.pdf (1.66 MB)

Document type

Article

Version

Published version

Publication date

2024-10-28

Publication license

cc-by (c) Ruberti, Andrea et al., 2024
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/224255

Agreement and reproducibility between 3DStent vs. Optical Coherence Tomography for evaluation of stent area and diameter

Journal Title

Authors

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Related resource

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03268-8

Abstract

3DStent is a novel rotational angiography imaging capable of 3D reconstruction and measuring stent area and diameter, without need for intravascular imaging. To compare 3DStent and OCT-derived stent area and diameter after PCI. Patients with de novo coronary lesions who underwent treatment with a single DES and evaluated by OCT and 3DStent were included. Stent area and diameter were measured by 3DStent, at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side and by OCT. From September 2023 to February 2024 six coronary lesions were analyzed. Post-PCI stent area measured by OCT was (mean +/- standard deviation) 7.03 +/- 2.85 mm(2) and by 3DStent 9.41 +/- 2.79 mm(2), 7.21 +/- 2.23 mm(2) and 5.63 +/- 1.83 mm(2) at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side, respectively. Stent diameter by OCT was 2.93 +/- 0.58 mm, and by 3DStent 3.27 +/- 0.50 mm, 2.86 +/- 0.49 mm and 2.52 +/- 0.45 mm at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side, respectively. Significant correlation was observed between OCT and 3DStent in relation to stent area (Exp(B) 3.35, mean of difference 0.19 +/- 1.01 mm(2), 95%CI -1.80-2.17 mm(2), p < 0.001) and diameter (Exp(B) 3.18, mean difference - 0.07 +/- 0.18 mm, 95%CI -0.43-0.30 mm, p < 0.001), particularly when 3DStent measurements performed at the mid side. Very high reproducibility was demonstrated by intra- and inter-observer analysis (r = 0.92 and r = 0.93 respectively). 3DStent appears to be an easy and reproducible tool to assess post-PCI stent area and diameter as compared to OCT.

Subject

Diagnòstic per la imatge, Cardiologia, Visualització tridimensional

Subject (English)

Diagnostic imaging, Cardiology, Three-dimensional display systems

Citation

Collections

Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)

Citation

RUBERTI, Andrea, et al. Agreement and reproducibility between 3DStent vs. Optical Coherence Tomography for evaluation of stent area and diameter. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 2024. Vol. 40, num. 2581-2589. ISSN 1569-5794. [consulted: 13 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/224255

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record