Agreement and reproducibility between 3DStent vs. Optical Coherence Tomography for evaluation of stent area and diameter

dc.contributor.authorRuberti, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorRinaldi, Riccardo
dc.contributor.authorOcchipinti, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorRamus, Liliane
dc.contributor.authorGuagliumi, Giulio
dc.contributor.authorSabaté Tenas, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorBrugaletta, Salvatore
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-10T18:48:32Z
dc.date.available2025-11-10T18:48:32Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-28
dc.date.updated2025-11-10T18:48:32Z
dc.description.abstract3DStent is a novel rotational angiography imaging capable of 3D reconstruction and measuring stent area and diameter, without need for intravascular imaging. To compare 3DStent and OCT-derived stent area and diameter after PCI. Patients with de novo coronary lesions who underwent treatment with a single DES and evaluated by OCT and 3DStent were included. Stent area and diameter were measured by 3DStent, at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side and by OCT. From September 2023 to February 2024 six coronary lesions were analyzed. Post-PCI stent area measured by OCT was (mean +/- standard deviation) 7.03 +/- 2.85 mm(2) and by 3DStent 9.41 +/- 2.79 mm(2), 7.21 +/- 2.23 mm(2) and 5.63 +/- 1.83 mm(2) at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side, respectively. Stent diameter by OCT was 2.93 +/- 0.58 mm, and by 3DStent 3.27 +/- 0.50 mm, 2.86 +/- 0.49 mm and 2.52 +/- 0.45 mm at abluminal, mid and endoluminal side, respectively. Significant correlation was observed between OCT and 3DStent in relation to stent area (Exp(B) 3.35, mean of difference 0.19 +/- 1.01 mm(2), 95%CI -1.80-2.17 mm(2), p < 0.001) and diameter (Exp(B) 3.18, mean difference - 0.07 +/- 0.18 mm, 95%CI -0.43-0.30 mm, p < 0.001), particularly when 3DStent measurements performed at the mid side. Very high reproducibility was demonstrated by intra- and inter-observer analysis (r = 0.92 and r = 0.93 respectively). 3DStent appears to be an easy and reproducible tool to assess post-PCI stent area and diameter as compared to OCT.
dc.format.extent9 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec752415
dc.identifier.issn1569-5794
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/224255
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03268-8
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2024, vol. 40, p. 2581-2589
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03268-8
dc.rightscc-by (c) Ruberti, Andrea et al., 2024
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject.classificationDiagnòstic per la imatge
dc.subject.classificationCardiologia
dc.subject.classificationVisualització tridimensional
dc.subject.otherDiagnostic imaging
dc.subject.otherCardiology
dc.subject.otherThree-dimensional display systems
dc.titleAgreement and reproducibility between 3DStent vs. Optical Coherence Tomography for evaluation of stent area and diameter
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
872793.pdf
Mida:
1.66 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Paquet de llicències

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
license.txt
Mida:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripció: