Amb motiu del tancament d'estiu, la validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 28 d'agost de 2026. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Con motivo del cierre de verano, la validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 28 de agosto de 2026. Disculpad las molestias
Due to the summer closure, document validation will resume starting August 28, 2026. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Files

870010.pdf (226.95 KB)

Document type

Article

Version

Published version

Publication date

2023-12-21

Publication license

cc by (c) Gel, Enric F., 2022
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/216591

'There can be only one': A response to Joseph C. Schmid

Journal Title

Authors

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Related resource

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000713

Abstract

Recently, in response to an article of mine, Joseph C. Schmid has argued that some traditional theistic arguments for God’s unicity are problematic in that they presuppose a controversial principle and conflict with Trinitarian theology. In this article, I answer Schmid’s concerns. I defend one of the original arguments while advancing new ones, and I vindicate my abductive argument for theism over naturalism.

Subject

Teisme, Naturalisme, Filosofia de la religió

Subject (English)

Theism, Naturalism, Philosophy of religion

Citation

Collections

Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)

Citation

GEL, Enric F. (Enric Fernández). 'There can be only one': A response to Joseph C. Schmid. Religious Studies. 2023. Vol. 59, num. 4, pags. 836-851. ISSN 0034-4125. [consulted: 18 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/216591

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record