'There can be only one': A response to Joseph C. Schmid
| dc.contributor.author | Gel, Enric F. (Enric Fernández) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-19T08:45:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-11-19T08:45:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-12-21 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2024-11-19T08:45:07Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Recently, in response to an article of mine, Joseph C. Schmid has argued that some traditional theistic arguments for God’s unicity are problematic in that they presuppose a controversial principle and conflict with Trinitarian theology. In this article, I answer Schmid’s concerns. I defend one of the original arguments while advancing new ones, and I vindicate my abductive argument for theism over naturalism. | |
| dc.format.extent | 16 p. | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.idgrec | 751528 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0034-4125 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/216591 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) | |
| dc.relation.isformatof | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000713 | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Religious Studies, 2023, vol. 59, num.4, p. 836-851 | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000713 | |
| dc.rights | cc by (c) Gel, Enric F., 2022 | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/ | * |
| dc.source | Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia) | |
| dc.subject.classification | Teisme | |
| dc.subject.classification | Naturalisme | |
| dc.subject.classification | Filosofia de la religió | |
| dc.subject.other | Theism | |
| dc.subject.other | Naturalism | |
| dc.subject.other | Philosophy of religion | |
| dc.title | 'There can be only one': A response to Joseph C. Schmid | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
Fitxers
Paquet original
1 - 1 de 1