Evaluation of effectiveness of photobiostimulation in alleviating side effects after dental implant surgery. A randomized clinical trial

dc.contributor.authorCaccianiga, Gianluigi
dc.contributor.authorPerillo, Letizia
dc.contributor.authorPortelli, Marco
dc.contributor.authorBaldoni, Marco
dc.contributor.authorGalletti, Cosimo
dc.contributor.authorGay Escoda, Cosme
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-05T14:02:28Z
dc.date.available2021-02-05T14:02:28Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-22
dc.date.updated2021-02-05T14:02:28Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: To assess if photobiostimulation (PBS) alleviates pain intensity/duration and swelling after implant surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty subjects (27 male and 33 female, with a mean age of 47,13 8.05 years) were included and randomly assigned to experimental group (implant surgery and photobiostimulation), placebo group (implant surgery and simulated photobiostimulation) and control group (implant surgery only). INCLUSION CRITERIA: subjects older than 20 years, with a healthy oral mucosa and requiring implant surgery. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: pregnancy, history of implant failure, light sensitivity, metabolic deseases, consumption of antibiotics or corticosteroids in the last two weeks, smokers and alcohol drinkers. Patients reported the pain experienced by using a numeric rating scale (NRS) at 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and from day 2 to 7. Swelling score was assessed by linear measurements and type and number of analgesic drugs within each time-point were recorded on a spreadsheet. Data of pain and amount of swelling were compared among the three groups by using the Kruskal-Wallis H Test and post-hoc comparisons tests. RESULTS: Pain in the experimental group was less compared to controls and placebo group, at each time intervals (p < 0.001) as well as the maximum pain score (experimental group: median = 2, interquartile range 2-3; control group: median = 8, interquartile range 3,75-9; placebo group: median = 8, interquartile range 6,25-9). Swelling was almost insignificant in the experimental group (maximum value = 1, interquartile range 0-2,75, at 24 hours) compared with control (maximum value = 6, interquartile range 5-8,75, at 24 hours) and placebo (maximum value = 6, interquartile range 5-8, at 24 hours). Subjects in the experimental group assumed less analgesics compared to both controls and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Photobiostimulation is an effective method to reduce pain intensity/duration and swelling after implant surgery.
dc.format.extent1 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec695546
dc.identifier.issn1698-4447
dc.identifier.pmid31967979
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/173703
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMedicina Oral SL
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23336
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, 2020, vol. 25, num. 2, p. e277-e282
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23336
dc.rights(c) Medicina Oral SL, 2020
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
dc.subject.classificationImplants dentals
dc.subject.classificationFotobiologia
dc.subject.classificationCirurgia dental
dc.subject.otherDental implants
dc.subject.otherPhotobiology
dc.subject.otherDental surgery
dc.titleEvaluation of effectiveness of photobiostimulation in alleviating side effects after dental implant surgery. A randomized clinical trial
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
695546.pdf
Mida:
988.01 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format