Lateral Terminations of salt walls and megaflaps: an example from Gypsum Valley Diapir, Paradox Basin, Colorado, USA

dc.contributor.authorEscosa Bernal, Frederic Oriol
dc.contributor.authorRowan, Mark G.
dc.contributor.authorGiles, Katherine A.
dc.contributor.authorDeatrick, Kyle T.
dc.contributor.authorMast, Allison M.
dc.contributor.authorLangford, Richard P.
dc.contributor.authorHearon IV, Thomas E.
dc.contributor.authorRoca i Abella, Eduard
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-30T10:57:34Z
dc.date.available2020-11-30T10:57:34Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-01
dc.date.updated2020-11-30T10:57:35Z
dc.description.abstractDescriptions of exposed salt structures help improve the ability to interpret the geometry and evolution of similar structures imaged in seismic reflection data from salt‐bearing sedimentary basins. This study uses detailed geologic mapping combined with well and seismic data from the southeastern end of the Gypsum Valley diapir (Paradox Basin, Colorado), to investigate the three‐dimensional geometry of the terminations of both the salt wall and its associated megaflap. The salt wall trends NW‐SE and is characterized by highly asymmetric stratal architecture on its northeastern and southwestern flanks, with thicker, deeper, gently dipping strata in the depositionally proximal (NE) minibasin and thinned older strata rotated to near‐vertical in a megaflap on the distal (SW) side. The megaflap terminates to the SE through a decrease in maximum dip and ultimately truncation by a pair of radial faults bounding a down‐dropped block with lower dips. East of these faults, the salt wall termination is a moderately plunging nose of salt overlain by gently southeast‐dipping strata, separated from the down‐dropped NE minibasin by a counterregional fault. From this analysis, and by comparison with analogue structures located elsewhere in the Paradox Basin and in the northern Gulf of Mexico, we propose a series of simple end‐member models in which salt walls and megaflaps may terminate abruptly or gradually. We suggest that controlling factors in determining these geometries include the original thickness and spatial distribution of the deep salt, the presence of nearby diapirs (which determines the fetch area for salt flow into the diapir), spatial patterns of depositional loading, and variations in the nature and location of salt breakout through the roof of the initial salt structure.
dc.format.extent32 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec683817
dc.identifier.issn0950-091X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/172436
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12316
dc.relation.ispartofBasin Research, 2018, vol. 31, num. 1, p. 191-222
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12316
dc.rightscc-by (c) Escosa Bernal et. al., 2018
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Dinàmica de la Terra i l'Oceà)
dc.subject.classificationCartografia geològica
dc.subject.classificationSalines
dc.subject.classificationFalles (Geologia)
dc.subject.otherGeological mapping
dc.subject.otherSalines
dc.subject.otherFaults (Geology)
dc.titleLateral Terminations of salt walls and megaflaps: an example from Gypsum Valley Diapir, Paradox Basin, Colorado, USA
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
683817.pdf
Mida:
11.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format