Using the Electronic Nose to Identify Airway Infection During COPD Exacerbations

dc.contributor.authorShafiek, Hanaa
dc.contributor.authorFiorentino, Federico
dc.contributor.authorMerino, Jose Luis
dc.contributor.authorLópez Causapé, Carla
dc.contributor.authorOliver, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorSegura, Jaume
dc.contributor.authorPaul, Ivan de
dc.contributor.authorSibila Vidal, Oriol
dc.contributor.authorAgustí García-Navarro, Àlvar
dc.contributor.authorCosío, Borja G.
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-15T10:44:21Z
dc.date.available2016-07-15T10:44:21Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-09
dc.date.updated2016-07-15T10:44:26Z
dc.description.abstractBackground The electronic nose (e-nose) detects volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled air. We hypothesized that the exhaled VOCs print is different in stable vs. exacerbated patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), particularly if the latter is associated with airway bacterial infection, and that the e-nose can distinguish them. Methods Smell-prints of the bacteria most commonly involved in exacerbations of COPD (ECOPD) were identified in vitro. Subsequently, we tested our hypothesis in 93 patients with ECOPD, 19 of them with pneumonia, 50 with stable COPD and 30 healthy controls in a cross-sectional case-controlled study. Secondly, ECOPD patients were re-studied after 2 months if clinically stable. Exhaled air was collected within a Tedlar bag and processed by a Cynarose 320 e-nose. Breath-prints were analyzed by Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) with "One Out" technique and Sensor logic Relations (SLR). Sputum samples were collected for culture. Results ECOPD with evidence of infection were significantly distinguishable from non-infected ECOPD (p = 0.018), with better accuracy when ECOPD was associated to pneumonia. The same patients with ECOPD were significantly distinguishable from stable COPD during follow-up (p = 0.018), unless the patient was colonized. Additionally, breath-prints from COPD patients were significantly distinguished from healthy controls. Various bacteria species were identified in culture but the e-nose was unable to identify accurately the bacteria smell-print in infected patients. Conclusion E-nose can identify ECOPD, especially if associated with airway bacterial infection or pneumonia.
dc.format.extent16 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec661059
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.pmid26353114
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/100546
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135199
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS One, 2015, vol. 10, num. 9, p. e0135199
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135199
dc.rightscc-by (c) Shafiek, H. et al., 2015
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject.classificationMalalties pulmonars obstructives cròniques
dc.subject.classificationPneumònia
dc.subject.classificationCompostos orgànics volàtils
dc.subject.classificationEstudi de casos
dc.subject.otherChronic obstructive pulmonary diseases
dc.subject.otherPneumonia
dc.subject.otherVolatile organic compounds
dc.subject.otherCase studies
dc.titleUsing the Electronic Nose to Identify Airway Infection During COPD Exacerbations
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
661059.pdf
Mida:
1.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format