Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation devices in the removal of debris from root canal irregularities in artificial root canals

dc.contributor.authorPlotino, Gianluca
dc.contributor.authorGrande, Nicola M.
dc.contributor.authorMercadé Bellido, Montserrat
dc.contributor.authorCortese, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorStaffoli, Simone
dc.contributor.authorGambarini, Gianluca
dc.contributor.authorTestarelli, Luca
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-09T12:50:56Z
dc.date.available2020-11-09T12:50:56Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-07
dc.date.updated2020-11-09T12:50:56Z
dc.description.abstractObjective: to evaluate the efficacy of different sonic and ultrasonic devices in the elimination of debris from canal irregularities in artificial root canals. Materials and Methods: a resin model of a transparent radicular canal filled with dentin debris was used. Five groups were tested, namely: Group 1 - ultrasonic insert 15.02; Group 2 - ultrasonic insert 25/25 IRRI K; Group 3 - ultrasonic insert 25/25 IRRI S; Group 4 - sonic insert 20/28 Eddy on a vibrating sonic air-scaler handpiece; Group 5 - 20.02 K-file inserted on a Safety M4 handpiece. Two different irrigants (5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA) and 3 different times of activation (20, 40, and 60 seconds) were tested. Means and standard deviations were calculated and statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests (p<0.05). Results: no statistically significant differences were found between the two irrigants used. Group 4 removed more debris than the other groups (p<0.05). Groups 1, 2, and 3 removed more debris than group 5 (p<0.05). A statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was found for the time of activation in all groups and at all canal levels, except between 40 and 60 seconds in group 4 at coronal and middle third level (p>0.05). Conclusions: no significant differences were found between 5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA. When the time of activation rises, the dentin debris removal increases in all groups. Both sonic and ultrasonic activation demonstrate high capacity for dentin debris removal.
dc.format.extent6 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec682068
dc.identifier.issn1678-7757
dc.identifier.pmid30624461
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/171888
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFaculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0045
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Oral Science, 2019, vol. 27, p. e20180045
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0045
dc.rightscc-by (c) Plotino, Gianluca et al., 2019
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
dc.subject.classificationSodi
dc.subject.classificationÀcids
dc.subject.classificationDesinfecció
dc.subject.otherSodium
dc.subject.otherAcids
dc.subject.otherDisinfection
dc.titleEfficacy of sonic and ultrasonic irrigation devices in the removal of debris from root canal irregularities in artificial root canals
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
682068.pdf
Mida:
486.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format