Macrolitter accumulation in tidal marsh wrack deposits in a large estuary

dc.contributor.authorGarcés Ordóñez, Ostin
dc.contributor.authorCanals Artigas, Miquel
dc.contributor.authorNoyce, Genevieve
dc.contributor.authorRovai, André
dc.contributor.authorCollin, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorThiel, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-18T08:06:29Z
dc.date.available2026-06-18T08:06:29Z
dc.date.issued2026-05-04
dc.date.updated2026-06-18T08:06:30Z
dc.description.abstractWrack refers to debris deposited along the upper intertidal zone by waves and tides. In the past, wrack consistedmainly of natural debris, but modern wrack includes anthropogenic macrolitter (AML). When AML is abundant,wracks become pollution hotspots that threaten ecosystem functioning. Here, we assess AML abundance, composition,and sources in wrack deposits from 27 tidal-marsh sites in the Chesapeake Bay estuary (USA) and examinerelationships with surrounding urban pressure and marsh conditions. Marsh wrack deposits in the estuary aredominated by wood, Phragmites, and marine macrophyte debris. AML abundance and mass range from 56 to4481 items km−1 and 0.9 to 254 kg km−1 of wrack, with highest values in the inner estuary. Both variables decreasewith increasing distance from main population centers. Marshes with higher vegetation density index alsohave high AML pollution. Most AML (93.5%) is positively buoyant, predominantly made of plastic (90%), andsmall (2–25 cm: 74.5%). Items are mainly plastic bottles and fragments, with a lifetime of <1-year. Older bottles(4 to >10 years-old) dominate the inner estuary, whereas newer bottles (<1 year-old) dominate the outer estuary.Food-consumption (38.9%) and fisheries (6.2%) related items are most prevalent. Over half of the AMLcomes from land-based sources, with>60% resulting from poor waste management. Marsh wrack deposits act asimportant accumulation zones for urban-derived AML, with high potential ecosystem impacts. Therefore, the innerestuary and its wrack deposits must be given priority for further research on AML transport, deposition, andcarbon-related effects, and mitigation actions.
dc.format.extent14 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec770025
dc.identifier.issn0025-326X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/230094
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd.
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2026.119848
dc.relation.ispartofMarine Pollution Bulletin, 2026, vol. 230, p. 119848
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2026.119848
dc.rightscc-by (c) Garcés Ordóñez, Ostin et al., 2026
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Dinàmica de la Terra i l'Oceà)
dc.subject.classificationEcologia dels pantans
dc.subject.classificationSediments d'estuaris
dc.subject.classificationSediments lacustres
dc.subject.otherSwamp ecology
dc.subject.otherEstuarine sediments
dc.subject.otherLake sediments
dc.titleMacrolitter accumulation in tidal marsh wrack deposits in a large estuary
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
937169.pdf
Mida:
5.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format