Time intervals and previous primary care consultations in the pathway to emergency cancer diagnosis

dc.contributor.authorBosch Genover, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorMontori Palacín, Elisabet
dc.contributor.authorCalvo Jiménez, Júlia
dc.contributor.authorCarbonell, Irene
dc.contributor.authorNaval Álvarez, José
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Lozano, Pedro Juan
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Soto, Alfonso
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-27T14:46:46Z
dc.date.available2026-02-27T14:46:46Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-01
dc.date.updated2026-02-27T14:46:46Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Time intervals and number of prior consultations in primary care (PC) are recognised metrics of diagnostic timeliness of cancer and are interrelated. However, whether and how the two measures correlate with each other in the emergency diagnostic pathway is unknown. We investigated the association between the number of prereferral consultations and the length of intervals from PC presentation to cancer diagnosis following emergency referral to hospital. Methods: Patients were eligible if they first consulted in PC and were diagnosed with cancer following emergency or nonemergency referral to hospital. We analysed for differences in PC and diagnostic intervals and number of consultations between emergency and nonemergency presenters and determined their associations by cancer type. Differences in presenting symptoms and stage at diagnosis between populations and according to number of consultations were also examined. Results: There were 796 emergency and 865 nonemergency presenters with comparable sociodemographic and comorbidity data. Correlation analysis in emergency presenters revealed a strong positive association between number of consultations and intervals for seven of 13 different cancers, including cancers characterised by high proportions of > 3 consultations and long intervals (pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancer) and vice versa for others (e.g., endometrial, cervical, or oesophageal cancer). Additionally, emergency presenters with > 3 consultations were more likely than those with 1-2 to report nonspecific symptoms (60 vs. 40%, respectively) and to be diagnosed at a later stage. Conclusion: System level interventions are needed to reduce unnecessary delays in the emergency diagnostic pathway, particularly in cancer patients with multiple prereferral consultations. The findings also suggest opportunities to reduce the proportion of emergency diagnoses by targeting symptomatic individuals pre-presentation.
dc.format.extent39 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec741956
dc.identifier.issn1877-7821
dc.identifier.pmid37651939
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/227676
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2023.102445
dc.relation.ispartofCancer Epidemiology, 2023, vol. 86, p. 102445
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2023.102445
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Elsevier, 2023
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject.classificationAtenció primària
dc.subject.classificationCàncer
dc.subject.classificationMedicina d'urgència
dc.subject.otherPrimary care
dc.subject.otherCancer
dc.subject.otherEmergency medicine
dc.titleTime intervals and previous primary care consultations in the pathway to emergency cancer diagnosis
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
840767.pdf
Mida:
10.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format