Avui, dilluns 8 de juny, el Dipòsit Digital no estarà operatiu de 15:00 a 17:00 h per tasques de manteniment. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Hoy, lunes 8 de junio, el Dipòsit Digital no estará operativo de 15:00 a 17:00 h debido a tareas de mantenimiento. Disculpen las molestias.
Today, Monday, Jun 8th, the Digital Repository will be unavailable due to a system update.

Document type

Article

Version

Published version

Publication date

All rights reserved

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/217987

Why do we run basic income experiments? From empirical evidence to collective debate

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

There are two major possible responses to the question: what (if anything) can justify a basic income experiment? An experiment might be justified either because it gathers positive empirical evidence supporting rolling out a basic income, or because it justifies the moral desirability of such a measure. This paper critically explores both responses, the "empirical" and "ethical claim" in light of the Barcelona B-MINCOME pilot, alongside other similar experiments. We sustained that although the empirical claim is necessary, there seems to be sufficient data to easily predict that all future experiments are to gather positive results too. Consequently, we argue that experiments are particularly well-equipped to foster debates on the work ethics and on the ethical dimension of social policies and welfare regimes in general.

Subject (English)

Citation

Citation

LAIN ESCANDELL, Bru and MERRILL, Roberto. Why do we run basic income experiments? From empirical evidence to collective debate. Basic Income Studies. 2021. Vol. 16, num. 1, pags. 27-38. ISSN 2194-6094. [consulted: 9 of June of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/217987

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record